Our Industry

Stanford receivers on the hunt for assets of 28,000 clients

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 25 February 2009 at 12:12:00

Vantis partners know how much clients have invested in Stanford vehicles andare in talks with institutions holding its assets to work out how much is in thepot

Receivers appointed by Vantis are looking to reclaim the assets of 28,000clients that invested in Stanford International Bank and Stanford Trust Company,two companies at the centre of an $8bn (£5.5bn) fraud investigation by the SEC.

Vantis partners Nigel Hamilton-Smith and Peter Wastell said they had put afigure on the amount of cash invested by clients, but did not know how much SIBand STC held in assets to pay back investors.

Hamilton-Smith and Wastell were appointed by the Financial ServicesRegulatory Commission of Antigua and Barbuda as joint receivers of the twocompanies last week in the wake of anSECinvestigation.

'Following our appointment , we have thus far been able to identify theamounts invested by clients and have put arrangements in place for theReceiver-Manager?s team and staff at [SIB and STC] to deal with clientenquiries,' they said.

The pair have started the process of communicating with the financialinstitutions they have identified as holding assets on behalf of SIB and STC.

They are also seeking co-operation arrangements with the US Receiver to helpwith more asset identification work, but the amount Stanford had in the bank topay investors back was unknown.

'At this time we are unable to ascertain the total value of assets held orreport on the timescale for the return of monies to investors. Our priority isto safeguard the interests of investors, identify and preserve assets andtogether with the international regulators and authorities and the US Receiver;we are working to complete these investigations as quickly as possible to avoidfurther inconvenience to SIB and STC's customers.'

'We have set up an email(stanfordenquiries@vantisplc.com)for all investor enquiries and have ensured that up to date statements can beissued to all clients, totaling some 28,000, by month end,' the receivers added.


Accountancy Age a Business Superbrand again

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 25 February 2009 at 11:30:00

Accountancy Age ranked alongside Google, Microsoft and PricewaterhouseCoopers

Accountancy Age has been named a Business Superbrand for thethirdyear in succession.

The listing among the top 500 business brands in the UK ranks Accountancy Agealongside the likes of Google, the BBC, Microsoft and the Financial Times inleading the way in quality, reliability and distinction, according to the Centrefor Brand Analysis.

The independent selection process was carried out through a vote by seniorbusiness leaders and more than 1,500 business professionals. The Centre forBrand Analysis, which makes the award, says: ?A Business Superbrand hasestablished the finest reputation in its field. It offers customers significantemotional and/or tangible advantages over its competitors, which customers wantand recognise.?

From the accountancy sector, PricewaterhouseCoopers was named the leadingbrand among the firms, followed by Ernst & Young. The ICAEW, CIMA and ACCAwere all also named among on the list.

Stephen Cheliotis, chairman of the expert council and CEO of The Centre forBrand Analysis, said: ?Congratulations must go to all the brands that made thetop 500 from the thousands of brands initially considered. There are 100 newbrands in the top 500, showing that while the top of the league experiencesrelative calm, overall volatility remains and brands have to fight hard to be inthe table, especially during these turbulent times.'


Cattles' FD stays on until Deloitte finishes review

Kevin Reed, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 25 February 2009 at 09:46:00

FD delays retirement until Deloitte completes impairment review

The finance director of sub-prime lender Cattles is to stay on beyondFebruary until a review of the business' impairment provisions is completed byDeloitte.

The lender's FD, James Corr, was due to retire at the end of February,however he will stay until Deloitte completes its review, which began last week.

The board has also suspended lending to new customers in its Welcome Financedivision to preserve liquidity.

Robert East, who was due to replace Corr, has seen his appointment deferreduntil further notice.

Further reading:

Read our interview with FD ofCattles rival Provident Financial

Visit Cattles


BDO says emerging economies following Europe downhill

Accountancy Age, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 25 February 2009 at 06:32:00

Firm study finds emerging market weaknesses

Europe's manufacturing sector has been hardest hit by the economic slowdown,but emerging economies are now being affected, according to research by BDO StoyHayward.

Emerging economy industries are now vulnerable, thwarting initial hopes thateconomies such as China and India would 'decouple' from the recession hittingdeveloped countries.

UK growth is expected to fall 1.2% in 2009, but will be outstripped by a 4.6%drop in Brazilian Gross Domestic Product, a 4.3% drop in Russia and a 1.8% slidein China.


KPMG swamped with interest for Lehman's HK assets

Accountancy Age, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 25 February 2009 at 06:31:00

More than 250 expressions of interested

KPMG has been approached by more than 250 parties as the liquidator attemptsto wind up Lehman Brothers' Hong Kong operations.

Head of real estate Michael Lindsay is on secondment to KPMG's Hong Kongoffice to oversee the disposal of Lehman's $1.25bn property portfolio.

The portfolio includes hotel developments, retail and commercial buildings.More than 90% of its country and currency risk is in Thailand and China.

Prospective buyers include rival investment banks, private equity funds,hedge funds and property companies.


PwC Ireland to cut salaries by 10%

Accountancy Age, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 25 February 2009 at 06:29:00

Wages cut in a bid to avoid redundancies

PricewaterhouseCoopers Ireland has cut 10% off the salaries of most of its2,200 employees.

The firm says it is part of a series of initiatives it is taking to avoidredundancies, according to the Irish Times and the IrishExaminer.

Yesterday, PwC held briefings for staff to outline measures it is taking inresponse to the recession. It will not rule out job cuts altogether.

'We are not planning widespread redundancies. Where we have surplus capacityand have exhausted all options, we may look to make some individuals rolesredundant,' the firm said in a statement.

Other measures the firm is taking include reduced working hours, incentivesto go on leave for travel or study and secondments to other PwC offices abroad.

There is also doubt over whether the firm will be able to offer all itstrainees work when their contracts expire.

Last week KPMG in Ireland revealed it was in a similar situation.

Go to:

IrishTimes story


Agresso/Coda group strong in 2008

Kevin Reed, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 24 February 2009 at 10:04:00

Business software providers announce strong growth and profits for 2008, butword caution for 2009

The Agresso and Coda group has announced strong revenue and profit growth foryear end 2008.

Business software provider Unit 4 Agresso increased revenues to 394m Eurosfrom 309m Euros, taking profits to 70m Euros.

UK revenues grew by 14% assuming constant exchange rates.

CFO Edwin van Leeuwen said the growth showed its strength in the publicsector and a number of other vertical specialisations, but worded caution for2009 prospects due to worsening economic circumstances.

'This does not mean Unit 4 Agresso is immune to the consequences of thecredit crisis and current economic circumstances make it very difficult topredict market demand in 2009.'


Recession brings bigger workloads

Accountancy Age, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 24 February 2009 at 09:16:00

Higher stress levels amid budget cuts

Increased workloads, higher stress levels and budget cuts are the result ofthe recession, a KPMG and Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development studyhas found.

Of 892 employers surveyed, 48 per cent say individual staff workloads haveincreased since the financial crisis hit.

Forty-six per cent also cite increased staff stress levels. Employees whoescape redundancy are frequently saddled with more work after their colleaguesdepart.

KPMG human resources partner Tim Payne said the onus was on managers tocommunicate effectively with staff and to carefully monitor workloads.

"Employees understand companies need to manage their costs but they stillexpect leaders to communicate clearly with them when changes are made,'' Paynesays.


KPMG appoints King Sturge to dispose of Original Shoe Company

Accountancy Age, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 24 February 2009 at 09:15:00

Qube and OSC stores on the blocks

KPMG has engaged King Sturge to dispose of 80 store leases held under theQube and Original Shoe company brand names.

Around 80 per cent of the stores traded under the OSC brand, selling brandedlifestyle clothing and footwear. KPMG has reportedly closed about 45 of thestores.

King Sturge is seeking buyers for individual or groups of shops, which arespread right across the UK. It says many of the stores are in prominent highstreet locations, such as Argyle Street, Glasgow, Arndale Centre, Manchester,and Meadowhall, Sheffield.


HMRC launches video help for small business

Accountancy Age, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 24 February 2009 at 09:14:00

Fronted by TV presenter Dan Snow

HM Revenue and Customs has launched a series of online videos aimed athelping small business tax payers.

The 10 videos provide advice on a range of tax issues, such as setting up abusiness, income tax for the self-employed, corporation tax and VAT.

Revenue has hired TV presenter Dan Snow to deliver the content. The seriesincludes case studies in an episode called Start-up diaries, which followsthree people setting up new businesses.


ICAS: tax ?simplification? would complicate small company tax

Nick Huber, Accountancy Age, Monday 23 February 2009 at 09:41:00

Institute urges government to rethink tax reform proposals

Government proposals aimed at simplifying corporation tax calculations andreturns for smaller companies are likely to cause confusion and make accountsmore opaque, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland has warned.

A Treasury discussion document published in the pre-Budget Report lastNovember, which closed for responses last week, suggested that small companiesmight base their statutory accounts on tax rules rather than generally acceptedaccounting principles, or might be taxed by reference to cash flows rather thanprofits.

ICAS has rejected the two options, arguing that they could complicate taxreturns simpler for small businesses, although possibly helping HM Revenue& Customs, and would make company accounts less informative for others.

Donald Drysdale, assistant director of tax at ICAS, said: 'Change in itselfcan impose administrative burdens, while also causing uncertainty. Businesses,especially small businesses, are facing commercial and financial uncertaintiesas they try to survive through an exceptionally harsh recession. This is not thetime for Government to be overturning existing rules for the sake of it.'

ICAS has urged the government to abandon its plans and instead aim tosimplify tax compliance for all small businesses, whether incorporated or not,ICAS said.

Applying the same measurement of taxable profits to companies andunincorporated businesses would be an important step towards simplification,ICAS added.

Further reading:

Treasury?simplification? would complicate small company tax, says ICAS

Corporationtax calculations and returns for smaller companies


KPMG has three months to sort out Mosaic

Accountancy Age, Accountancy Age, Monday 23 February 2009 at 07:37:00

Debt repayment deadline approaching

KPMG has been told by its audit client Mosaic Fashions - owners of Principlesand Oasis - that the company has just three months to refinance its debtrepayments if it is to survive.

Mosaic revealed in a statement attached to its accounts at Companies Housethat it has a standstill agreement with its bankers Kaupthing expiring on 31May, according to the Daily Telegraph.

In total, Mosaic has debts exceeding 400 million. Baugur, which has a 49 percent stake, recently put all of its UK assets into administration.

Mosaic has already tried to sell a number of assets, including Shoe Studioand Principles.


Insolvency regime needs reform, says IoD

Accountancy Age, Accountancy Age, Monday 23 February 2009 at 07:32:00

Need to rehabilitate companies with existing management and protection fromcreditors

The UK insolvency framework needs to be re-aligned to better promote thesurvival of viable companies, the head of the Institute of Directors MilesTempleman argues.

In a letter to ft.com, Templeman argues that the Chapter 11 regime in theUnited States does a better job in sustaining enterprises as going concerns thanUK laws do.

Templeman points to the ability of boards to run struggling companies underChapter 11, in which they can pursue a re-organisation with creditors at anearly stage.

In contrast, UK companies are run by court-appointed administrators, in whathe describes as a 'management-displacing process.'


SEC targets Stanford's London auditor for info

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Friday 20 February 2009 at 17:02:00

US markets watchdog says approaches to Stanford International Bank's auditfirm CAS Hewlett for information have been unsuccessful

The SEC's 'several' attempts to get information out of Stanford InternationalBank's auditors in relation to an alleged $8bn fraud have been unsuccessful.

Allen Stanford, the cricket-loving billionaire owner of SIB has been chargedby the SEC with perpetrating the massive fraud, linked to high-interestinvestments known as Certificates of Deposit.

The US markets watchdog declined to comment about whether it was trying totrack down Celia Hewlett, the head of CAS Hewlett, whose whereabouts iscurrently unknown.

The SEC said in a statement: 'SIB told investors that their deposits weresafe because the Antiguan regulator responsible for oversight of the bank'sinvestment portfolio, the Financial Services Regulatory Commission (the 'FSRC'),audited its financial statements.

'But, contrary to the bank's representations to investors, the FSRC does notaudit or verify the assets SIB claims in its financial statements. Instead,SIB's accountant, CAS Hewlett & Co, a small local accounting firm in Antiguais responsible for auditing the multi-billion dollar SIB's investment portfolio.

'The commission attempted several times to contact [CAS] Hewlett bytelephone. No one ever answered the phone.'


SAP launches first XBRL BusinessObjects collaboration

Rachael Singh, Accountancy Age, Friday 20 February 2009 at 10:50:00

SAP launches its first XBRL offering to work across all SAP andBusinessObjects products

SAP has launched its first XBRL product in conjuction with BusinessObjectssince it acquired the business intellligence software giant in 2007.

The latest product, SAP BusinessObjects XBRL Publishing, will be compatiblewith all BusinesObjects products and SAP.

James Fisher, senior director of solution marketing SAP said: 'There are anumber of XBRL solutions, but at SAP we have a huge database and by bringing thesolution to market, we have created a single point or application that can beused across all of the SAP products.'

Fisher could see 'no reason' that would stop XBRL Publishing being used withvarious applications such as Excel and competitors' software.

Extensible business reporting language, XBRL, is a type of technology thatallows for comparability of financial information by tagging the data.

Companies across the world are preparing for adoption into XBRL as the SEC inthe US is requiring companies to use the new technology language to submit itsbusiness/financial reports.

Supporters of XBRL claim the standard makes it easier for investors andshareholders to compare the performance of companies and can cut financialreporting costs for companies, but those who oppose the transition believe itadds unnecessary complexity.

Further reading:

XBRL talks the SEC's language

Simplified taxsubmissions for small businesses


Profile: Martyn Wates, CFO of the Co-operative Group

Melanie stern, Accountancy Age, Thursday 23 October 2008 at 17:20:00

It has an image as the caring, sharing face of the supermarket sector â€" butThe Co-operative Group is serious about its business, CFO Martyn Wates tells ourreporter

Structured investment vehicles losing millions of pounds to the sub-primecrisis, landmark acquisitions, OFT consultations, lucrative joint ventures inChina, doubling shareholder dividends â€"the Co-operativeGroup is no less corporate than anyone in the City.

But perception being nine-tenths of reality, the company’s mutual model comesover a tad too cuddly for many in the business world; unlisted, owned andgoverned by millions of ordinary people united by a common aim of doing good,where possible, by doing well.

From the 12th floor of Manchester’s New Century House, Co-op’s chieffinancial officer Martyn Wates can glance across a patch of prime city realestate that houses the group’s central offices, its financial services HQ in the25-storey CIS Tower over the way, clad top to bottom in solar panelling.

Against forbidding views of the Pennines, the ageing cluster of buildingsserving as the Co-op nucleus looks a little worn. But the group plans to flattenthe whole area and build a new office complex. ‘We’ll do it sympathetically,though,’ says Wates surveying from a great height.

The Co-operative Group is nothing if not sympathetic by nature, being wed toa core of social goals harking to its beginnings as a movement for the welfareof the poor more than a century ago. If you know anything about Co-op, you’llknow it for those little local supermarkets whose owner is some sort ofsocialist organisation â€" though you’re sketchy on the details â€" or as the ownerof that internet bank, smile.

Co-op’s financial services business posted a slight increase in profit forthe first half of 2008, reporting ‘shareholder profit’ before tax, significantitems and short-term investment fluctuations of £73.4m, up from £35.4m at thesame time in 2007. The group reported 2007 operating profit ‘before significantitems and chan-ges in valuations of investment properties’ of almost £323m, a35.2% year-on-year increase.

Co-op members enjoyed dividends (Co-op calls it ‘total share of profitpayment’) of £38.1m in 2007, compared to £19.6m in 2006. Where Co-op has been apoorer performer is in pushing its brand as a group and among its businessunits.

As Wates concedes, there has long been a lack of any cohesive message, butthis has merely reflected how much change there has been as today’s group hasemerged as a mothership to countless minnow mutuals across the UK, and theworld’s largest consumer co-operative society.

‘We haven’t been able to project ourselves in the way that, say, Tesco has,’says Wates. Indeed, Tesco doesn’t own 311 separate business subsidiaries orsocieties, as Co-op does.

The strategy has been fruitful: the company’s purchase of convenience storechains Alldays, in 2002, then Balfour in 2003 helped it quietly grow its estateto become the UK’s number five food retailer. On top of this, the group is alsothe UK’s biggest farmer with an estate of 700,000 acres of farmland acrossEngland and Scotland, and operates a £250m car dealership. Between absorbingsmaller co-operatives and buying up portfolio-boosters like Alldays, the grouphas been one of the most acquisitive in the UK’s business landscape. So clarityhas been difficult.

This has been changing since the group enlarged following the merger withanother mutual, United Co-operatives, in May last year, the owner of UnitedNorwest Co-operative where Wates had been CFO since 2002 (he was madeCFO-designate to succeed Co-op’s retiring CFO Brian Portman).

A year later, this May, came the pivotal £1.5bn Somerfield acquisition,bumping Co-op’s 5% share of the UK supermarket business up to 8%.

By the time you read this, Wates will have the Office of Fair Trading’sdecree on if, and how many, of Somerfield’s 3,000 stores it must dispose of tosatisfy competition criteria; he will then add to his £1.5bn budget to revampCo-op’s existing network of 4,300 stores (as well as its other retail-basedbusinesses, such as its 90 banking sites and 374 travel agency operations) toinclude those it retains.

‘We’ve been waiting for critical mass within the business before we got outthe big guns and now we’ve got it,’ says Wates. ‘In the past, people probablyviewed us as a bit quaint, old-fashioned, safe, solid and trustworthy, but notas exciting or modern as our rivals. We’re doing a lot of work to overhaul ouroffering now. Our shares would be significantly up if we were a listed business,because I know the Somerfield purchase is a value-enhancing transaction.’

As CFO of an organisation that can never unpick its financial targets,speaking with Wates is more akin to speaking with a CEO who can talk about whyhis baked beans are the best, then switch to the forensics of discounted cashflow. A good man to have around.

‘I’ve met a few FDs, blue-sky men, who consider themselves above thenitty-gritty. But what makes this business great is the detail; the customergoing into our shop and buying something, leading to profit and we never forgetthat. And I like to think I can argue with anyone strategically. But if youdon’t know what’s going on, you’re just throwing the dice. You’re gambling.’

Not a strategy that would sit well with an ethics-based model.

Active engagement in companies and regions where the group believes money andpositive change can be made is underpinned by Wates who backs the groupoperating, for example, local supermarkets in areas its rivals shun because itis too deprived, too dangerous, and deemed not worth the time.

Co-op, Wates says, will stick with these often loss-making operations becausethey make real the group’s social policies.

The group made a £20m investment in July 2007 in a joint venture with Chinesepharmaceutical generics manufacturer Tasly Group, to build and staff aproduction plant in the country. Many will wonder how Co-op’s strict ethical policies will be effected in a country also noted for its relationship withsweatshop labour.

Wates argues that engagement is better than avoidance. ‘A lot of plcs are notventuring there yet and I suppose it does raise ethical issues: why should Co-optrade with China? Because we will work with this company which already has highstandards, to raise standards in that country. We are commercially focused andwe can make the ethics in that deal work, having done a lot of social auditingon employee conditions and manufacturing practices over there.’

Social responsibility

One area in which Wates seems uncomfortable is talking about the group’s useof structured investment vehicles, on which it lost £31.8m in 2007 as thesub-prime crisis took hold. The group’s last Responsible Business report saidCo-op was founded on working for ordinary people who were fed up of‘profiteering shopkeepers selling adulterated food’.

Are SIVs socially responsible? And if so, are those investing in SIVs notparty to profiteering from adulterated loans, as we now know they frequentlyare?

In his defence, Wates wasn’t yet CFO of Co-op when these investments weremade. ‘But there were so many layers to these products, weren’t there? Someonesold a standard mortgage and then built a mortgage book and an income streamfrom that, which was sold to another institution. This was then aggregated withothers and bounced on again; but by then they’re just traded assets, aren’tthey? What we were picking up was a financial asset.

‘That income stream I am paying £35m for will give me £3m a year for the next20 years. Had that asset been traceable to arms manufacturing or something likethat, you’re right, we would not have been there. But it was divorced fromthat.’

This seems no less profit-minded than any regular corporate’s attitude toinvestment. Which only serve to illustrate the rather unique position thatWates, as CFO of a company that sells products on the back of ethics, is in.

Co-operative but still corporate

Accusations that Co-op isn’t under the same economic pressure as othercompanies disappoint Wates, who cites some figures â€" doubled dividends in 2007and the intention to double profit in 2008/09 â€" and his dual responsibility tomake the business as profitable as possible while handing out millions each yearto the long list of social, ethical or charitable groups it funds.

‘We’ve looked at distribution strategies among our competitors, askedourselves what returns our shareholders expect and what we can afford to pay,and we’ve benchmarked our distribution policies along with the best of them,’ hesays. ‘Instead of paying dividends to some faceless institutional shareholders,our dividends go to our members, the people who shop with us, our employees,various charities and the local communities we trade in.

‘Some people can use ethics as an easy excuse to hide behind [for lack ofprofits or dividends]. If you’re ethical, you can’t shy away from beingefficient, challenging and driving hard. We approach investment and shareholderreturn on capital the same way anyone else does. Being a one-person, one-voteorganisation we’re certainly different. But we’re a part of the corporateworld.’

The full version of this interview appeared in the October issue ofFinancialDirector


Global ethics: enlightened path

Charles Tilley, Accountancy Age, Thursday 23 October 2008 at 17:02:00

Ethics should not be a casualty of the credit crunch

Short-termism got us here. And, as business for many companies becomes afight for survival, short-termism threatens to be the corporate management creedfor the downturn too.

Undeniably, the bald message from hard-pressed finance teams to their boardswill be: it’s the cashflow, stupid.

But does corporate ethics deserve to be an early casualty of these worryingtimes? Clearly not, if

you care about professionalism, your workforce, or about the future of theplanet.

And there are pragmatic, self-interested reasons for companies too. Firstly,business leaders must build sustainable enterprises. Spectacular failures thistime round, like Lehman Brothers and AIG, have not been shown to be corrupt, butthey ­ and indeed swathes of the banking sector ­ failed to build lastingbusinesses.

The reasons behind this are as fiendishly complex as a tranche of sub-primedebt. But what we do know is that in many financial service companies riskmanagers didn’t enjoy the kudos of deal makers, that individual bonuses were notaligned with company strategy, and that the risk placed on the company wasn’tfactored in enough to exceptional remuneration.

In the end maintaining professional standards is what underpins business. Redlights should flash on risk registers not just when performance is unduly bad,but inexplicably good. A corporate culture rooted in solid values is likely tosee that as common sense. A greed culture won’t.

Now in the downturn firms have the opportunity to embed ethics and a saneattitude to risk into their strategy. Bolting on ethics to corporate behavioursis no more effective than a sterile tick-box compliance culture.

And there is another factor too: regulation, until recently a dirty word, issuddenly fashionable again.

Organisations that choose to cut back on their ethical performance will beout of step, and possibly exposed to hefty fines.

So whatever the day-to-day pressures on cashflow as the downturn bites,companies must resist the temptation to cut corners.

They can take comfort that research by the Institute of Business Ethics showsthat firms that take ethics seriously prosper most.

Charles Tilley is chief executive of CIMA, whose eventGlobal ethics a myth? is on 19 November. Go to cimaglobal.com/ethics


FSB urges govt to create ₤1bn survival fund

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Thursday 23 October 2008 at 14:32:00

FSB is urging the government to create ₤1bn survival fund as Darling andMandelson plead with banks

While Alistair Darling and Lord Mandelson, the business secretary, ispleading with Britain’s banks to lift lending to small business to last year'slevels, theFederationof Small Business (FSB) has wants the government to go further and create£1bn Small Business Survival Fund.

FSB is suggesting part of the the funds should be provided by the EuropeanInvestment Bank, which has already earmarked £1bn for small UK business, but itwants Brussels to drop the tight conditions tied to the money, the The DailyTelegraph reports.

The federation hopes to meet the chancellor and the banks next week afterdiscussing the package with Baroness Vadera, minister for competitiveness andsmall business, and opposition parties.

FSB is also proposing big businesses which fail to honour their bills in timeto be named and shamed.

Further reading:

ReadThe Daily Telegraph story


AATV: Banks' audits and ICUs

Accountancy Age, Thursday 23 October 2008 at 11:56:00

Banks beef up their intensive care units while pressure grows for a review oftheir audits

Alex Hawkes talks to David Jetuah about bank moves to beef up their intensivecare units to help struggling businesses while Gavin Hinks explains the pressurebuilding for a review of bank audits


On the money with Gavin Hinks

Gavin Hinks, Accountancy Age, Thursday 23 October 2008 at 11:37:00

Hold on to your hats, because if I am not very much mistaken accountants andthe profession are in for a rough ride

With the government’s massive bail out of banks and the markets looking likethey’ve bought into Gordon Brown’s solution, it provides a breather, time topoint the finger and to demand change. And some of that flak is heading yourway.

course, anyone could have told you this, no self respecting accountant couldimagine anything different.

But last week, as Brown’s plan was discussed in the House, the targeting ofthe profession began somewhat in earnest.

Michael Meacher, a former government minister, was first protesting at ‘dodgyauditing’. He is already on record as having written to the prime ministercalling for a Committee of Inquiry to look into ‘governance, accounting andauditing of the banks’.

Then came Harry Cohen, a CIPFA member, similarly calling for action, andtabling a motion that some form of improvement in the accounting and auditingneeded to go alongside the rescue package.

There used to be a time when Austin Mitchell would get all polemical overthis sort of thing, but Meacher and Cohen are today’s advance guard calling forchange.

Once again accounting is a matter for politics. Just as the fair valuestandard has become a cause for comment for everyone from Brown to NicholasSarkozy, you couldn’t say right now that audit won’t be too.

Politicians live and breathe this kind of thing and they can smell blood. Thebanks are smarting from having to be rescued and they sense that now is the timefor a left wing agenda to capitalise and move power back to the state.

Expect to hear more from these voices.

Gavin Hinks is the editor of Accountancy Age


Plug pulled on SMEs' electricity supplier

Kevin Reed, Accountancy Age, Thursday 23 October 2008 at 11:25:00

E4B enters adminstration: SMEs' electricity supply safe

An electricity supplier to 40,000 small businesses has enteredadministration.

Administrators from PricewaterhouseCoopers were appointed to Electricity 4Business yesterday evening.

E4B is a Milton Keynes-based independent electricity retailer to SMEs, whichemployed 140 people.

Volatility in the energy market was the cause of the company’s demise, saidjoint administrator Stuart Maddison.

The company will be wound down but customers will not be affected.

'We will be working closely with OFGEM to ensure an orderly wind down of thecompany’s activities and would like to reassure E4B’s customers that theadministration will not affect their supply of electricity,' added Maddison.

Further reading:

Business queues up for 'intensivecare' units

Tom Aikens restaurants out ofadministration after MBO


Tenon seeks fund management go-ahead

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Thursday 23 October 2008 at 06:59:00

Tenon is applying for FSA go-ahead for fund management to invest indistressed businesses with potential

Tenon is applyingfor FSA authorisation for fund management through Tenon Capital Management(TenonCap), aiming to invest in distressed businesses with turnaround potentialand turnovers between £5m and £30m, initially through the unregulated T-Fund.

Tenon will invest up to £1.5m in TenonCap and directors will contributeanother £250,000. The firm is looking to aggregate commitments of between £15mand £20m, , IFA online reports.

‘Having seen several economic downturns we are greatly aware of theopportunities they can produce’, TenonCap CEO Matthew Bowker said.

‘We believe we are well placed to identify the best opportunities and toachieve successful turnarounds and profitable exits for our investors.’

Further reading:

Readthe IFA online story


Sovereign funds target UK plc

David Jetuah , Accountancy Age, Thursday 23 October 2008 at 00:40:00

UK plcs are a takeover target for sovereign wealth funds warns Grant Thornton

Grant Thorntonsays that government intervention is making UK plcs a takeover target forsovereign wealth funds, which could put more FDs in the firing line.

Corporate finance experts at the firm have seen an upswing in man-dates fromoffshore outfits looking to make bargain acquisitions in the UK, especially fromfast developing nations such as India, with many of these firms seeing theextent of economic difficulties affecting the UK economy as offering a goldenopportunity to snap up bargains.

‘These companies and in some cases sovereign wealth funds want to get afoothold in the UK and are doing so forcefully,’ said David Brooks, corporatefinance partner. ‘If developing economies, particularly in Asia, hold upsignificantly better than the UK, expect to see a steady buy-up of UK companies.

‘There is certainly the chance of more government influenced M&Ainitiatives before the worst of the financial crisis is past,’ Brooks said.

In Q3, there were 192 purchases of UK companies by offshore interests for atotal of £32.7bn ­ but while deal numbers were down from 280 in the previousquarter, values were up by £13.24bn.

M&A activity between UK companies has been at its lowest level since1993, but the government’s propping up of blue chip businesses has kept thevalue of deals high.

The government-driven takeover of HBOS by Lloyds TSB had a reported price tagof £12.54bn. Government involvement also helped boost the value of foreignpurchases in the UK. The sale of the British Energy Group to French firm EDF wasworth £9.17bn, according to GT.

‘The almost completely hands-off government approach applied for more thantwo decades on driving M&A deals has been replaced with significant marketintervention, albeit centred on the financial sector,’ Brooks added.


New owner will retain Coda brand

Rachael Singh, Accountancy Age, Thursday 23 October 2008 at 00:33:00

The acquisition of Codaby Unit 4Agresso will not result in a merger of the two software brands

While the two brands are under the same parent company and both provideaccountancy software, although in different capacities to a variety oforganisations, there are no plans to change the name of the company or brands,said a Coda representative at the latest Softworld event at London’s Olympia.

David Turner, group marketing director at Coda, said: ‘Unit 4 Agresso, theparent company, had a strategy to integrate other strong systems in the market.

‘To be profitable in the software business you need big bucks. We’recompeting against SAP & Oracle

so this helps us as now we have it,’

he added.


Londons in commission wrangle

Sarah Limbrick, Accountancy Age, Thursday 23 October 2008 at 00:28:00

Debt solutions firm heads for the High Court over disputed commission

Debt solutions firm Londons is headed for a High Court showdown withchartered accountants KS Tan & Co in a dispute over commissions.

Londons, who trade as IVAuk, claim insolvency practitioners KS Tan & Coowe around £385,000 in commission.

The companies entered an arrangement in January 2005, in which KS Tan &Co would pay commission of one third of gross revenue for individual voluntaryarrangements referrals from Londons, according to a High Court writ. Bothcompanies agreed to formalise their arrangement in May 2005, but negotiationsdid not end on a marketing agency agreement, the writ claims.

North west London based KS Tan & Co sent an email on 17 February thisyear terminating the agreement with Londons, alleging there had been a breach ofcontract; a claim denied by Londons.

Londons said the firm’s actions amounted to an anticipatory breach ofcontract, discharging it from its obligations, and is demanding dam-ages toinclude commissions due for individuals introduced, of £385,682.

A KS Tan & Co spokesman said it was seeking to make a counter claimagainst Londons, alleging breach of a marketing agreement.


Gordon Ramsay fined over late accounts

Judith Tydd, Accountancy Age, Thursday 23 October 2008 at 00:24:00

Celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay has racked up fines of £1,100 for being latewith his company accounts

According to a spokeswoman at Companies House, penalties incurred by GordonRamsay Holdings in failing to submit accounts from 2006 have reached the maximum£1,000 per year.

Accounts for the 2006 financial reporting year are almost 16 months overdue,with 30 June, 2007 listed as the due date. Company accounts for 2007 were due by30 June ­ now almost four months in arrears, attracting a £100 fine on top offines for the previous year.

A spokesperson for Ramsay was unavailable to confirm reports that the companywould file accounts by 23 October.


Business queues up for 'intensive care' units

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Thursday 23 October 2008 at 00:14:00

Number of businesses being referred to 'intensive care unit' on the up asbanks are scrambling to meet the increased demand for help

A major bank has beefed up its ‘intensive care unit’ dealing with companiesat risk of going bust, as other banks say they are scrambling to meet increaseddemand for help.

Insolvency practitioners have said the number of people being referred to theunits has shot up in recent months andLloyds TSB toldAccountancy Age it had taken steps to cater for increased activity.

‘We have increased staff numbers in our business support services unit. If weare recruiting it’s clearly evidence of a very difficult time over recentmonths,’ said a Lloyds spokesman. ‘There has been an increase in the numbers ofbusinesses talking to us.’

One IP said that the banks had been ‘hiring like crazy’ at their turnarounddepartments, but other banks said only that the work was increasing.

‘There has been no real change in headcount, but there are more people comingto us,’ said an HSBCspokesman. ‘It’s at times like these when the relationship a business has withits bank is critical.’

The banks are currently trying to stave off the effects of a jittery market,but the number of comp-anies approaching the intensive care units can be takenas a barometer for conditions on the ground.

Some banks remained guarded about their activities. The banks usually splittheir services into business banking, dealing with operations that have aturnover of less than £1m, and corporate, which deals with business generatingmore than that amount.

HBOS saidit had not seen any ‘significant’ headcount increases within the high risk teamsof its corporate division, but companies coming to them for advice was ‘notsomething that we’d comment on and we don’t give out headcount figures for anyof our divisions,’ a spokesman said.

Barclays had notreplied at the time of going to press.

IPs are still bracing themselves for the full brunt of the credit crunch tohit smaller businesses at the coalface of the economy, which accounts for theclose eye being kept on activity levels at the intensive care units.

The renewal of banking facilities will be critical for companies in thecoming months as banks continue to take a tough stance on lending, according toone leading IP.

Despite IPs being busy, the expected spike in insolvencies has not yetmaterialised. ‘We’re close to Armageddon, but we’re not quite there yet,’ onesaid.


KPMG loses audit of US' largest mortgage lender

Gavin Hinks, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 22 October 2008 at 09:38:00

Bank of America backs PricewaterhouseCoopers for audit

KPMG has lost the audit of Countrywide, the US mortgage lender stricken bythe subprime crisis and at one time the country's largest lender.

New owner, Bank of America, has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers to do theaudit, according to a Reuters report.

The news was revealed in a regulatory filing made in the US on Tuesday. Thefiling by Bank of America said KPMG’s audit reports of 2006 and 2007 included noadverse opinion on the lender’s books.

Prior to Bank of America’s acquisition Countrywide was the biggest mortgagelender in the US.


Tom Aikens restaurants out of administration after MBO

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 22 October 2008 at 09:38:00

Michelin-starred chef forced to put eateries into administration beforemanagement buyout by private equity players

Tom Aikens, the celebrated chef, has been forced to put his two flagshiprestaurants into administration.

Suppliers, believed to be owed thousands of pounds, found out last weekendthat the two companies were in trouble,accordingto Bloomberg.

Tom's Kitchen and Tom Aikens are still trading, but are now in the hands ofprivate investors after a management buyout through an investment vehicle calledTA Holdco Ltd.


PwC, E&Y clinch lucrative TARP contracts

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 22 October 2008 at 08:30:00

US Treasury has recruited big four firms PwC and E&Y in its emergencybuyouts of toxic assets

TheUS treasury has announced it has recruited big four firmsPricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) and Ernst & Young (E&Y) to help in theemergency buyouts of toxic assets from struggling financial institutions byproviding ‘accounting and internal controls services needed to administer thecomplex portfolio of troubled assets’, including whole loans and mortgage-backedsecurities.

The treasury chose the two firms from a pool of 12 and the initial orders forPwC and E&Y are worth $191,469.27 and $492,006.95, respectively.

The contracts were awarded as part of the government's new $700bn TroubledAsset Relief Program (TARP) to bail out financial companies lumbered with assetsdegraded by falling US home prices,AgenceFrance Presse reports.

The treasury said PwC would help the department establish a ‘sound internalcontrol posture’ and E&Y would provide general accounting support and expertaccounting advice.


US and international standard setters to work on joint credit crisis s

Gavin Hinks, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 21 October 2008 at 11:16:00

IASB and FASB to create new advisory board to work on financial instrumentsaccounting

A new high level advisory group is to be established by internationalstandard setters along with their counterparts in the US in a bid to find a longterm solution to accounting for financial instruments.

Accounting for securities and derivatives have become highly controversialduring the credit crunch as banks suffered ever increasing writes down to theiron the back of falling asset values.

Many have blamed fair value accounting for contributing to the financialcrisis.

The European Commission is today expected to discuss further proposals thatwould allow banks to reclassify all financial asset classes as ‘held forinvestment’, thus avoiding a valuation under fair value principles.

The joint working announcement and commitment to a long term solution toaccounting for financial instruments will be viewed as way of placating theEuropean Commission and heading off the drive towards a carve out.

Joint work would also help maintain the two board’s drive towards convergenceand US adoption of IFRS.

The IASB and FASB will use the new advisory group to counsel both standardsetters on a route forward. It will meet in public and will include externalchair persons and members. Public roundtables will also be staged in Europe, theUS and Asia.

IASB chairman Sir David Tweedie said: ‘The establishment of this high leveladvisory group and the holding of public roundtables should ensure that bothboards together reach common high-quality solutions that hep return confidenceto the marketplace.’

Robert Herz, chairman of the FASB, said: ‘We expect this new global group togenerate valuable short and longer-term input for both boards to consider.’


Laser Radio may be on the brink of administration

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 21 October 2008 at 09:38:00

Directors understood to have applied to the courts to enter administration inthe wake of a compulsory wind-up petition being lodged by creditors

Local radio group Laser Broadcasting is preparing to enter administration.

The troubled company faced a compulsory wind-up petition from one of itscreditors last week and then applied to courts itself to be put intoadministration before the compulsory order could be heard, theGuardianreported.

The winding-up petition was brought last week by the Gateshead-based venturecapitalist Capital North East No1 Limited Partnership.

Laser Broadcasting, via subsidiaries, holds nine commercial radio licences.They are Bath FM, Brunel FM, three Sunshine-branded stations in Ludlow, Hereford& Worcester and Hereford/Monmouth, two Quay West stations in west Somersetand Bridgwater, 3TR in Warminster, and Fresh Radio in the Yorkshire Dales.

Laser's administration application will be heard in the high court in Leedsthis Friday.


Investors call on EC to drop more changes to fair value reporting

Gavin Hinks, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 21 October 2008 at 09:38:00

Corporate Reporting Users Forum calls on European Commission to dropproposals for further IAS39 carve-outs

A senior group of investors and analysts has written an open letter to theEuropean Commission insisting that there be no further carve-outs to thecontroversial accounting IAS39 during a meeting to be held in Brussels today.

The letter, published in the FT today, says: ‘Now especially, investors needcomparability and transparency, not further uncertainty and inconsistency.’

Signed, among others, by Nick Anderson, head of research at InsightInvestment and Peter Elwin, head of accounting and valuation research atCazenove, the names on the letter are all from the Corporate Reporting UsersForum (CRUF), a pan European grouping of investment analysts.

The Commission has already endorsed changed made to international standardsthat bring them into line with US GAAP. But the agenda at today’s meeting tabledmuch broader changes that would allow all classes of financials instrument to bereclassified and therefore duck the application of fair value accounting.

The FT letter says that CRUF believes ‘that further changes, which go beyondaligning IFRS with US GAAP, risk severely undermining the confidence users havein the accounts produced by European companies.’

Yesterday, the Investment Management Association released a statement sayingthe proposed changes could threaten transparency and comparability.

Last week JP Morgan released a paper signalling its disappointment with IASBchanges but also stating its objection to further reform of the standards.


Conservatives propose 1p cut to national insurance

Judith Tydd, Accountancy Age, Monday 20 October 2008 at 10:06:00

SME sector should be thrown a lifeline, Tory leader David Cameron says

National Insurance should be cut by 1p, the Tories have said, to give smallbusinesses a shot in the arm.

The move is designed to stymie the impacts of the credit crisis on smallbusiness.

According tobbc.com, thereduction should last six months and the scheme would apply to businesses withfour or less staff.

Cameron said SMEs would be 'going to the wall unless they get help', and the1p cut could save an estimated £600 per business â€" costing the Treasury £225m.

He also said in preventing the economic downturn from spiraling into arecession, the plight of small businesses needs to be considered very carefully.

'We would like it if there was a magic wand. If we were like Sweden and had abudget surplus we could do much more,' he said.

Cameron is also calling for a six month VAT holiday for medium-sizedbusinesses.


Tire giant wheels in new CFO

Alex Hawkes, Accountancy Age, Monday 20 October 2008 at 09:51:00

Darren R. Wells named new CFO at Goodyear

Tire giant Goodyear has named Darren R. Wells as its new CFO.

Wells, 42, replaces W. Mark Schmitz, who is leaving to pursue otherinterests, the companysaid in a statement.

Schmitz, 57, has been CFO for 14 months.

Wells is a car industry veteran, having spent ten years at Ford, and mostrecently was one of the key leaders and architects of Goodyear's financialrestructuring.

'The innovative plans to restructure our balance sheet executed underDarren’s leadership served as the foundation of the company’s rebirth as astronger, more respected competitor in the tire industry,' chief executiveRobert J. Keegan said.

'As chief financial officer, Darren will use his outstanding business andfinancial skills and strong leadership capabilities to generate shareholdervalue.'

A native of Indianapolis, Wells earned his bachelor of arts degree fromDePauw University in Greencastle, Indiana, and his MBA in finance from IndianaUniversity.

He held positions of increasing importance in 10 years at Ford Motor Company,including assignments in Australia for Ford Credit and Ford InvestmentEnterprises.

Schmitz was previously with Tyco International’s Fire and Security segment asvice president and chief financial officer for four years prior to joiningGoodyear.

'We appreciate Mark’s contributions during a challenging period in ourindustry and in the global economy, and wish him well in the next phase of hiscareer,' Keegan said.

Further Reading:

Read the company'sstatement


AIG brings in Herzog as CFO

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Monday 20 October 2008 at 09:28:00

Embattle insurer appoints comptroller David Herzog as its chief financialofficer in moves to address its capital structure and expenses regime

AIG has appointed comptroller David Herzog as its new chief financialofficer.

Herzog, the troubled insurer's comptroller, replaces Steven Bensinger.Bensinger was the insurer's acting CFO, but he has left the company to pursueother opportunities.

Herzog will play a central role in overseeing the insurer's plan to addressits capital structure and pay down the credit facility from the Federal ReserveBank of New York.

He will also work closely with Chief Administrative Officer Richard Booth inan enterprise-wide review of expenses and practices, thecompanysaid.

Herzog has been senior vice president and comptroller of AIG since June 2005.He joined American General Corp. in February 2000 and, following AIG'sacquisition of American General in 2001, was appointed Chief Operating Officerfor the combined domestic life insurance companies. He was elected AIG's VicePresident, Life Insurance in 2003 and was named Chief Financial Officer of AIG'sWorldwide Life Insurance operations in 2004.

Further reading:

AIGfaces probe for 'outrageous expenditure'


AIG brings in Herzog as CFO

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Monday 20 October 2008 at 09:28:00

Embattle insurer appoints comptroller David Herzog as its chief financialofficer in moves to address its capital structure and expenses regime

AIG has appointed comptroller David Herzog as its new chief financialofficer.

Herzog, the troubled insurer's comptroller, replaces Steven Bensinger.Bensinger was the insurer's acting CFO, but he has left the company to pursueother opportunities.

Herzog will play a central role in overseeing the insurer's plan to addressits capital structure and pay down the credit facility from the Federal ReserveBank of New York.

He will also work closely with Chief Administrative Officer Richard Booth inan enterprise-wide review of expenses and practices, thecompanysaid.

Herzog has been senior vice president and comptroller of AIG since June 2005.He joined American General Corp. in February 2000 and, following AIG'sacquisition of American General in 2001, was appointed Chief Operating Officerfor the combined domestic life insurance companies. He was elected AIG's VicePresident, Life Insurance in 2003 and was named Chief Financial Officer of AIG'sWorldwide Life Insurance operations in 2004.

Further reading:

AIGfaces probe for 'outrageous expenditure'


French orders emergency audit of its banks

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Monday 20 October 2008 at 08:42:00

The French government orders emergency audit of all French banks after Caissed’Epargne suffers huge trading loss

The French finance minister, Christine Lagarde, has ordered an emergencyaudit of all French banks after one of the country's biggest savings banks,Caissed'Epargne, suffered a €600m (£466.6m) loss in unauthorised equityderivatives trading.

A team of four or five traders were caught out, exceeding their limits in thepanic triggered by last week's stock market crash, by so-called ‘routine controlprocedures’. The positions were immediately closed and traders disciplined, theGuardian reports.

The incident has led to the resignation of Charles Milhaud, Caisse’schairman; Nicolas Mérindol, his chief executive officer, and Julien Carmona,finance director.

As the French banking commission started investigating the affair, Lagardevented her frustration, saying she was 'depressed' by this latest act ofunauthorised trading by a French bank.

Further reading:

Readthe Guardian story


France orders emergency audit of its banks

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Monday 20 October 2008 at 08:42:00

The French government orders emergency audit of all French banks after Caissed’Epargne suffers huge trading loss

The French finance minister, Christine Lagarde, has ordered an emergencyaudit of all French banks after one of the country's biggest savings banks,Caissed'Epargne, suffered a €600m (£466.6m) loss in unauthorised equityderivatives trading.

A team of four or five traders were caught out, exceeding their limits in thepanic triggered by last week's stock market crash, by so-called ‘routine controlprocedures’. The positions were immediately closed and traders disciplined, theGuardian reports.

The incident has led to the resignation of Charles Milhaud, Caisse’schairman; Nicolas Mérindol, his chief executive officer, and Julien Carmona,finance director.

As the French banking commission started investigating the affair, Lagardevented her frustration, saying she was 'depressed' by this latest act ofunauthorised trading by a French bank.

Further reading:

Readthe Guardian story


It’s official â€" UK in recession, E&Y reports

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Monday 20 October 2008 at 07:59:00

Corporations have to prepare for bleak times ahead, according to the latest E&Y ITEM economic autumn forecast

Corporations and businesses have to brace themselves against the prospect ofa contracting economy over the next three quarters, according to anErnst& Young (E&Y) ITEM Club autumn forecast released today, which repotsthe UK economy is now in recession, following dramatic deterioration in the lastquarter.

The ITEM report forecasts the economy will not bottom out before the secondhalf of next year and expects only a weak recovery in 2010. It predicts the GDPis likely to drop by 1% next year â€" the first year of negative growth since 1992and growth is forecast by only 1% in 2010.

‘We now have to face up to the reality of an economy that has been seriouslyweakened by recent dramatic events,’ Peter Spencer, Ernst & Young ITEM Clubchief economist, says. ‘The effects of the credit crisis are spreading out fromthe financial and housing sectors and impacting every part of our domesticeconomy.’

ITEM warns the supply of credit is likely to remain severely restricted andcorporate profitability will continue to suffer, triggering widespreadreductions in investment and employment. Business investment is alreadysubsiding and ITEM expects it to fall back by 5% next year.


It’s official â€" UK in recession, E&Y reports

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Monday 20 October 2008 at 07:59:00

Corporations have to prepare for bleak times ahead, according to the latest E&Y ITEM economic autumn forecast

Corporations and businesses have to brace themselves against the prospect ofa contracting economy over the next three quarters, according to anErnst& Young (E&Y) ITEM Club autumn forecast released today, which repotsthe UK economy is now in recession, following dramatic deterioration in the lastquarter.

The ITEM report forecasts the economy will not bottom out before the secondhalf of next year and expects only a weak recovery in 2010. It predicts the GDPis likely to drop by 1% next year â€" the first year of negative growth since 1992and growth is forecast by only 1% in 2010.

‘We now have to face up to the reality of an economy that has been seriouslyweakened by recent dramatic events,’ Peter Spencer, Ernst & Young ITEM Clubchief economist, says. ‘The effects of the credit crisis are spreading out fromthe financial and housing sectors and impacting every part of our domesticeconomy.’

ITEM warns the supply of credit is likely to remain severely restricted andcorporate profitability will continue to suffer, triggering widespreadreductions in investment and employment. Business investment is alreadysubsiding and ITEM expects it to fall back by 5% next year.


E&Y touted as Landsbanki administrators

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Friday 17 October 2008 at 10:32:00

Speculation increases Ernst & Young will be handling the administrationof the UK assets of collapsed Icelandic bank

Ernst & Young may be close to winning the high-profile administration ofthe UK assets of Landsbanki, the troubled Icelandic bank.

The government approached veteran administrator Alan Bloom to see if he wouldstep in, according topressreports.

Bloom and three other administrators from E&Y are already helping thedirectors of Landsbanki subsidiary Heritable UK plc manage its loan book, whilelooking for a buyer for the remainder of the business.

E&Y is also handling operations at Kaupthing Singer & FriedlanderLimited, the UK arm of Icelandic bank Kaupthing.

On the issue of the Landsbanki administration, the firm declined to commenton press speculation.


E&Y touted as Landsbanki administrators

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Friday 17 October 2008 at 10:32:00

Speculation increases Ernst & Young will be handling the administrationof the UK assets of collapsed Icelandic bank

Ernst & Young may be close to winning the high-profile administration ofthe UK assets of Landsbanki, the troubled Icelandic bank.

The government approached veteran administrator Alan Bloom to see if he wouldstep in, according topressreports.

Bloom and three other administrators from E&Y are already helping thedirectors of Landsbanki subsidiary Heritable UK plc manage its loan book, whilelooking for a buyer for the remainder of the business.

E&Y is also handling operations at Kaupthing Singer & FriedlanderLimited, the UK arm of Icelandic bank Kaupthing.

On the issue of the Landsbanki administration, the firm declined to commenton press speculation.


FSA chief says mark to market must be debated

Gavin Hinks, Accountancy Age, Friday 17 October 2008 at 08:41:00

Accounting rule an inherent part of reviewing capital requirements for banks,says Turner

Regulators must examine mark to market accounting as part of a fundamentaldebate on the setting of banks’ capital requirements, the chairman of theFinancial Services Authority has said.

Lord Turner told the Financial Times that the debate was required and thatalongside issues such as bonus structures, the transfer of risk and theregulation of liquidity and capital, mark to market accounting must beconsidered.

However, the interview did not elaborate on how a debate on mark to market,or fair value, accounting would be managed. Neither did it hint at whetherrecent steps taken by the International Accounting Standards Board, and endorsedby the European Commission’s Council of Ministers, to allow the reclassificationof some financial instruments so they are not subject to a fair valuecalculation were adequate.

If the FSA does undertake a review of mark to market it is likely to come atthe issue from the point of view of capital adequacy requirements for banks,quiet a different set of interests from those behind the work of the IASB insetting accounting standards.

The SEC announced yesterday that it was to stage round table discussions thismonth to explore the effects of mark to market accounting, whether it changesthe behaviour of users and whether it remains useful to investors andregulators.

There has been immense pressure in the US, UK and Europe to suspend mark tomarket amid claims that it has exacerbated the current financial crisis andunfairly undermined the balance sheets of financial institutions.

Investors and regulators have mostly stood by the rule.


FSA chief says mark to market must be debated

Gavin Hinks, Accountancy Age, Friday 17 October 2008 at 08:41:00

Accounting rule an inherent part of reviewing capital requirements for banks,says Turner

Regulators must examine mark to market accounting as part of a fundamentaldebate on the setting of banks’ capital requirements, the chairman of theFinancial Services Authority has said.

Lord Turner told the Financial Times that the debate was required and thatalongside issues such as bonus structures, the transfer of risk and theregulation of liquidity and capital, mark to market accounting must beconsidered.

However, the interview did not elaborate on how a debate on mark to market,or fair value, accounting would be managed. Neither did it hint at whetherrecent steps taken by the International Accounting Standards Board, and endorsedby the European Commission’s Council of Ministers, to allow the reclassificationof some financial instruments so they are not subject to a fair valuecalculation were adequate.

If the FSA does undertake a review of mark to market it is likely to come atthe issue from the point of view of capital adequacy requirements for banks,quiet a different set of interests from those behind the work of the IASB insetting accounting standards.

The SEC announced yesterday that it was to stage round table discussions thismonth to explore the effects of mark to market accounting, whether it changesthe behaviour of users and whether it remains useful to investors andregulators.

There has been immense pressure in the US, UK and Europe to suspend mark tomarket amid claims that it has exacerbated the current financial crisis andunfairly undermined the balance sheets of financial institutions.

Investors and regulators have mostly stood by the rule.


Landsbanki savers in Guernsey unlikely to recoup deposits

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Friday 17 October 2008 at 07:45:00

Savers with accounts in the Guernsey Landsbanki subsidiary are unlikely torecover all their money

Deloitte,administrators of the Guernsey subsidiary of Icelandic Landsbanki warned

yesterday more than 2000 savers of the bank were unlikely to recoup all their

money.

Depositors have been offered a preliminary pay-out worth just 30%. An initialsurvey of LandsbankiGuernsey’s assets and liabilities by Deloitte found only £41m of the £121mowed to depositors and others was available for distribution, the FinancialTimes reports.

The administrators said their ability to pay depositors in full had beenhampered by

the subsequent collapse of Heritable Bank, a UK subsidiary of Landsbanki.Heritable

held £36m of Landsbanki Guernsey assets.

Rick Garrard, one of the administrators, warned that, without a depositorprotection scheme in Guernsey, depositors were forced to rely on the governmentsof Guernsey, the UK and Iceland to compesate any shortfall, which he said 'isnot an obligation and cannot be assumed'.

Further reading:

Audit Commission admits to £10m Iceland deposits

E&Y takes over Heritable’s loan book

Readthe Financial Times story


Landsbanki savers in Guernsey unlikely to recoup deposits

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Friday 17 October 2008 at 07:45:00

Savers with accounts in the Guernsey Landsbanki subsidiary are unlikely torecover all their money

Deloitte,administrators of the Guernsey subsidiary of Icelandic Landsbanki warned

yesterday more than 2000 savers of the bank were unlikely to recoup all their

money.

Depositors have been offered a preliminary pay-out worth just 30%. An initialsurvey of LandsbankiGuernsey’s assets and liabilities by Deloitte found only £41m of the £121mowed to depositors and others was available for distribution, the FinancialTimes reports.

The administrators said their ability to pay depositors in full had beenhampered by

the subsequent collapse of Heritable Bank, a UK subsidiary of Landsbanki.Heritable

held £36m of Landsbanki Guernsey assets.

Rick Garrard, one of the administrators, warned that, without a depositorprotection scheme in Guernsey, depositors were forced to rely on the governmentsof Guernsey, the UK and Iceland to compesate any shortfall, which he said 'isnot an obligation and cannot be assumed'.

Further reading:

Audit Commission admits to £10m Iceland deposits

E&Y takes over Heritable’s loan book

Readthe Financial Times story


AIG faces probe for 'outrageous expenditure'

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Friday 17 October 2008 at 07:27:00

AIG faces probe for 'unwarranted and outrageous expenditure after paying hugeexecutive bonuses

AmericanInternational Group, the US insurer rescued in a taxpayer-funded$85bn(£49bn) bailout last month, is facing an investigation for 'unwarranted andoutrageous expenditures' after the company paid huge executive bonuses and spent£50,000 on a UK shooting trip.

In a letter to AIG's board of directors, New York attorney general AndrewCuomo

demanded the company stop 'extravagant' expenditures and recover millions ofdollars in unreasonable payments, or face legal action, the EveningStandard reports.

'The party is over,' Cuomo said after discovering a $5m bonus and a $15mgolden parachute had been given to Martin Sullivan, the Essex-born former chiefexecutive, last March. 'No more hunting trips. No more luxury resorts. They arenot going to have the party and leave the hangover for the taxpayers.'

Cuomo has also demanded an accounting inspection of AIG's executiveompensation and benefits since January 2007. He said the government's financialrescue of AIG made the expenditures 'even more irresponsible'.

Further reading:

Ex AIG chief blames mark-to-market for losses

PwC settles AIG lawsuit

Readthe Evening Standard story


AIG faces probe for 'outrageous expenditure'

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Friday 17 October 2008 at 07:27:00

AIG faces probe for 'unwarranted and outrageous expenditure after paying hugeexecutive bonuses

AmericanInternational Group, the US insurer rescued in a taxpayer-funded$85bn(£49bn) bailout last month, is facing an investigation for 'unwarranted andoutrageous expenditures' after the company paid huge executive bonuses and spent£50,000 on a UK shooting trip.

In a letter to AIG's board of directors, New York attorney general AndrewCuomo

demanded the company stop 'extravagant' expenditures and recover millions ofdollars in unreasonable payments, or face legal action, the EveningStandard reports.

'The party is over,' Cuomo said after discovering a $5m bonus and a $15mgolden parachute had been given to Martin Sullivan, the Essex-born former chiefexecutive, last March. 'No more hunting trips. No more luxury resorts. They arenot going to have the party and leave the hangover for the taxpayers.'

Cuomo has also demanded an accounting inspection of AIG's executiveompensation and benefits since January 2007. He said the government's financialrescue of AIG made the expenditures 'even more irresponsible'.

Further reading:

Ex AIG chief blames mark-to-market for losses

PwC settles AIG lawsuit

Readthe Evening Standard story


It's time to rewrite the 3 R's

Alex Hawkes, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 18:37:00

The body that represents recovery professionals is revamping its governance.But if you ask me, its board structure isn’t its biggest problem

Ask members of the public, and they’d struggle to tell you precisely why R3is called ‘R3’. We know, of course, that it stands for ‘Rescue, Recovery andRenewal’, the, um, well known three ‘R’s of the insolvency profession.

To the general public, the body probably sounds like a character from StarWars.

Maybe it’s not bothered, but while it’s thinking about its structure, comingup with a name that means something to the man on the Clapham Omnibus might beworth some thought.

The problem with R3 is that, if you write it in any context, not just in themedia, you’d have to add another sentence explaining what it is. Why not justhave a name that explains what it is?

Some might question too what the relevance of two of those ‘R’s is, as well.

Recovery I can understand, but Rescue? It isn’t a lifeboat association. Andrenewal? Sounds a little bit New Labour, doesn’t it?

R3 does do some good work, its warnings on debt management plans recentlybeing a good example of the impact it can have.

But just think how big that impact could be.

Alex Hawkes is the news editor of Accountancy Age


It's time to rewrite the 3 R's

Alex Hawkes, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 18:37:00

The body that represents recovery professionals is revamping its governance.But if you ask me, its board structure isn’t its biggest problem

Ask members of the public, and they’d struggle to tell you precisely why R3is called ‘R3’. We know, of course, that it stands for ‘Rescue, Recovery andRenewal’, the, um, well known three ‘R’s of the insolvency profession.

To the general public, the body probably sounds like a character from StarWars.

Maybe it’s not bothered, but while it’s thinking about its structure, comingup with a name that means something to the man on the Clapham Omnibus might beworth some thought.

The problem with R3 is that, if you write it in any context, not just in themedia, you’d have to add another sentence explaining what it is. Why not justhave a name that explains what it is?

Some might question too what the relevance of two of those ‘R’s is, as well.

Recovery I can understand, but Rescue? It isn’t a lifeboat association. Andrenewal? Sounds a little bit New Labour, doesn’t it?

R3 does do some good work, its warnings on debt management plans recentlybeing a good example of the impact it can have.

But just think how big that impact could be.

Alex Hawkes is the news editor of Accountancy Age


It's time to rewrite the 3 R's

Alex Hawkes, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 18:37:00

The body that represents recovery professionals is revamping its governance.But if you ask me, its board structure isn’t its biggest problem

Ask members of the public, and they’d struggle to tell you precisely why R3is called ‘R3’. We know, of course, that it stands for ‘Rescue, Recovery andRenewal’, the, um, well known three ‘R’s of the insolvency profession.

To the general public, the body probably sounds like a character from StarWars.

Maybe it’s not bothered, but while it’s thinking about its structure, comingup with a name that means something to the man on the Clapham Omnibus might beworth some thought.

The problem with R3 is that, if you write it in any context, not just in themedia, you’d have to add another sentence explaining what it is. Why not justhave a name that explains what it is?

Some might question too what the relevance of two of those ‘R’s is, as well.

Recovery I can understand, but Rescue? It isn’t a lifeboat association. Andrenewal? Sounds a little bit New Labour, doesn’t it?

R3 does do some good work, its warnings on debt management plans recentlybeing a good example of the impact it can have.

But just think how big that impact could be.

Alex Hawkes is the news editor of Accountancy Age


It's time to rewrite the 3 R's

Alex Hawkes, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 18:37:00

The body that represents recovery professionals is revamping its governance.But if you ask me, its board structure isn’t its biggest problem

Ask members of the public, and they’d struggle to tell you precisely why R3is called ‘R3’. We know, of course, that it stands for ‘Rescue, Recovery andRenewal’, the, um, well known three ‘R’s of the insolvency profession.

To the general public, the body probably sounds like a character from StarWars.

Maybe it’s not bothered, but while it’s thinking about its structure, comingup with a name that means something to the man on the Clapham Omnibus might beworth some thought.

The problem with R3 is that, if you write it in any context, not just in themedia, you’d have to add another sentence explaining what it is. Why not justhave a name that explains what it is?

Some might question too what the relevance of two of those ‘R’s is, as well.

Recovery I can understand, but Rescue? It isn’t a lifeboat association. Andrenewal? Sounds a little bit New Labour, doesn’t it?

R3 does do some good work, its warnings on debt management plans recentlybeing a good example of the impact it can have.

But just think how big that impact could be.

Alex Hawkes is the news editor of Accountancy Age


Insider Business Club: mid-market outsourcing

Damian Wild, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 18:11:00

Whether it is to aid growth or cut costs, more businesses are turning tooutsourcing, according to our experts

Are mid-market companies embracing outsourcing and which finance servicesare being put out?

Mark Holland, partner, Baker Tilly and ICAEW IT faculty

I think it’s a trend that is growing. Mid-sized companies are seeing theopportunity now to benefit from the services, the efficiency gains, thereliability and the additional functionality that outsourcing can bring to themthat, perhaps, up until relatively recently, was only possible for their largercorporate colleagues.

There have been changes in the last few years in technology and in ways ofworking that mean those benefits are now far more accessible. Some businessesare taking up the opportunity, or at least looking at it.

Outsourcing has tended to be done more for positive reasons, i.e. growth anddevelopment, rather than purely as a cost-cutting exercise. I would beinterested to see whether, given the current environment, it continues to begrowth that is the key driver or whether cost cutting perhaps raises it.

With the commercial usage of the internet as it is now, it is possible forbusinesses and outsourcers to share the same information simultaneously whereas,in the past, outsourcing the finance function might have been a question ofbasically losing control over everything. You wouldn’t know anything until theset of reports hits your desk in a paper copy a week or two later.

Those days are over. Now what we are seeing is a collaborative approach, apartnership approach between the outsourced delivery company that is actuallydoing the final part of the finance function and the company that has outsourcedpart of that function.

The components that we are seeing outsourced are increasingly around some ofthe less value-added areas. For example, purchase ledger, reconciliation,preparation of management reports, KPI reports, that sort of thing. We tend notto see credit control being outsourced to such an extent because that istouching customers.

Are companies willing to outsource ‘core’ services?

Peter Simons, technical specialist, CIMA

I work with a forum of leading companies ­ we call them enterprise-sizedcompanies ­ and this has already happened in their area for some time now. WhenI talk to members about developments in the finance function and tell them thismay come down the line, they have been in denial.

But increasingly now there are anecdotes coming back from the audience insmaller mid-sized and even SME companies where they are saying: ‘Yes, this iswhat we are doing too.’ So it’s an exciting time for accountants.

People have no problem outsourcing their car fleet or outsourcing cateringthe canteen because they never saw that as being core. But what is interestingis that in the last few years, people have thought, well, maybe HR isn’t thatcore, IT isn’t that core and now they are saying that accounts are not thatcore.

That’s a shift because politically HR were probably weak at the board level,while IT are geeks ­ nobody understands what they do anyway. But finance used toalways be at the fore as something that people had to have at the board tableand previously they would not contemplate outsourcing that.

How can you best manage an outsourced service?

Keith Wilson, commercial director, BaxterStorey

We are a provider of outsourcing services ­ catering, reception services,etc. In our IT department we also outsource a lot of our services to supportcompanies. There is a variety of them, although we do have a central small hubthat manages those outsourced services.

I think that is key to make sure that you keep the control when you outsourcethe technical parts of a service.

It would probably be fair to say that it happened by accident, or happened byevolution. We have grown very rapidly. We have been going for seven years and wehave grown rapidly in that period of time.

It was therefore very difficult for our IT department to keep up with thatgrowth. So we were forced into making sure that we had best practice by goingout into the market.

I think there will be a drive to outsource in the current environment. Thebig issue that is facing us all is the whole issue of risk management and Ithink people will want to bring in experts in a particular field ­ whatever itmaybe ­ to manage the risk. Without doubt that will become a driver.

I think it will force organisations to start looking at what services do theydo themselves and what do they do externally.

Chaired by Damian Wild

Watch the events and sign up atwww.insiderbusinessclub.com


Insider Business Club: mid-market outsourcing

Damian Wild, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 18:11:00

Whether it is to aid growth or cut costs, more businesses are turning tooutsourcing, according to our experts

Are mid-market companies embracing outsourcing and which finance servicesare being put out?

Mark Holland, partner, Baker Tilly and ICAEW IT faculty

I think it’s a trend that is growing. Mid-sized companies are seeing theopportunity now to benefit from the services, the efficiency gains, thereliability and the additional functionality that outsourcing can bring to themthat, perhaps, up until relatively recently, was only possible for their largercorporate colleagues.

There have been changes in the last few years in technology and in ways ofworking that mean those benefits are now far more accessible. Some businessesare taking up the opportunity, or at least looking at it.

Outsourcing has tended to be done more for positive reasons, i.e. growth anddevelopment, rather than purely as a cost-cutting exercise. I would beinterested to see whether, given the current environment, it continues to begrowth that is the key driver or whether cost cutting perhaps raises it.

With the commercial usage of the internet as it is now, it is possible forbusinesses and outsourcers to share the same information simultaneously whereas,in the past, outsourcing the finance function might have been a question ofbasically losing control over everything. You wouldn’t know anything until theset of reports hits your desk in a paper copy a week or two later.

Those days are over. Now what we are seeing is a collaborative approach, apartnership approach between the outsourced delivery company that is actuallydoing the final part of the finance function and the company that has outsourcedpart of that function.

The components that we are seeing outsourced are increasingly around some ofthe less value-added areas. For example, purchase ledger, reconciliation,preparation of management reports, KPI reports, that sort of thing. We tend notto see credit control being outsourced to such an extent because that istouching customers.

Are companies willing to outsource ‘core’ services?

Peter Simons, technical specialist, CIMA

I work with a forum of leading companies ­ we call them enterprise-sizedcompanies ­ and this has already happened in their area for some time now. WhenI talk to members about developments in the finance function and tell them thismay come down the line, they have been in denial.

But increasingly now there are anecdotes coming back from the audience insmaller mid-sized and even SME companies where they are saying: ‘Yes, this iswhat we are doing too.’ So it’s an exciting time for accountants.

People have no problem outsourcing their car fleet or outsourcing cateringthe canteen because they never saw that as being core. But what is interestingis that in the last few years, people have thought, well, maybe HR isn’t thatcore, IT isn’t that core and now they are saying that accounts are not thatcore.

That’s a shift because politically HR were probably weak at the board level,while IT are geeks ­ nobody understands what they do anyway. But finance used toalways be at the fore as something that people had to have at the board tableand previously they would not contemplate outsourcing that.

How can you best manage an outsourced service?

Keith Wilson, commercial director, BaxterStorey

We are a provider of outsourcing services ­ catering, reception services,etc. In our IT department we also outsource a lot of our services to supportcompanies. There is a variety of them, although we do have a central small hubthat manages those outsourced services.

I think that is key to make sure that you keep the control when you outsourcethe technical parts of a service.

It would probably be fair to say that it happened by accident, or happened byevolution. We have grown very rapidly. We have been going for seven years and wehave grown rapidly in that period of time.

It was therefore very difficult for our IT department to keep up with thatgrowth. So we were forced into making sure that we had best practice by goingout into the market.

I think there will be a drive to outsource in the current environment. Thebig issue that is facing us all is the whole issue of risk management and Ithink people will want to bring in experts in a particular field ­ whatever itmaybe ­ to manage the risk. Without doubt that will become a driver.

I think it will force organisations to start looking at what services do theydo themselves and what do they do externally.

Chaired by Damian Wild

Watch the events and sign up atwww.insiderbusinessclub.com


Insider Business Club: mid-market outsourcing

Damian Wild, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 18:11:00

Whether it is to aid growth or cut costs, more businesses are turning tooutsourcing, according to our experts

Are mid-market companies embracing outsourcing and which finance servicesare being put out?

Mark Holland, partner, Baker Tilly and ICAEW IT faculty

I think it’s a trend that is growing. Mid-sized companies are seeing theopportunity now to benefit from the services, the efficiency gains, thereliability and the additional functionality that outsourcing can bring to themthat, perhaps, up until relatively recently, was only possible for their largercorporate colleagues.

There have been changes in the last few years in technology and in ways ofworking that mean those benefits are now far more accessible. Some businessesare taking up the opportunity, or at least looking at it.

Outsourcing has tended to be done more for positive reasons, i.e. growth anddevelopment, rather than purely as a cost-cutting exercise. I would beinterested to see whether, given the current environment, it continues to begrowth that is the key driver or whether cost cutting perhaps raises it.

With the commercial usage of the internet as it is now, it is possible forbusinesses and outsourcers to share the same information simultaneously whereas,in the past, outsourcing the finance function might have been a question ofbasically losing control over everything. You wouldn’t know anything until theset of reports hits your desk in a paper copy a week or two later.

Those days are over. Now what we are seeing is a collaborative approach, apartnership approach between the outsourced delivery company that is actuallydoing the final part of the finance function and the company that has outsourcedpart of that function.

The components that we are seeing outsourced are increasingly around some ofthe less value-added areas. For example, purchase ledger, reconciliation,preparation of management reports, KPI reports, that sort of thing. We tend notto see credit control being outsourced to such an extent because that istouching customers.

Are companies willing to outsource ‘core’ services?

Peter Simons, technical specialist, CIMA

I work with a forum of leading companies ­ we call them enterprise-sizedcompanies ­ and this has already happened in their area for some time now. WhenI talk to members about developments in the finance function and tell them thismay come down the line, they have been in denial.

But increasingly now there are anecdotes coming back from the audience insmaller mid-sized and even SME companies where they are saying: ‘Yes, this iswhat we are doing too.’ So it’s an exciting time for accountants.

People have no problem outsourcing their car fleet or outsourcing cateringthe canteen because they never saw that as being core. But what is interestingis that in the last few years, people have thought, well, maybe HR isn’t thatcore, IT isn’t that core and now they are saying that accounts are not thatcore.

That’s a shift because politically HR were probably weak at the board level,while IT are geeks ­ nobody understands what they do anyway. But finance used toalways be at the fore as something that people had to have at the board tableand previously they would not contemplate outsourcing that.

How can you best manage an outsourced service?

Keith Wilson, commercial director, BaxterStorey

We are a provider of outsourcing services ­ catering, reception services,etc. In our IT department we also outsource a lot of our services to supportcompanies. There is a variety of them, although we do have a central small hubthat manages those outsourced services.

I think that is key to make sure that you keep the control when you outsourcethe technical parts of a service.

It would probably be fair to say that it happened by accident, or happened byevolution. We have grown very rapidly. We have been going for seven years and wehave grown rapidly in that period of time.

It was therefore very difficult for our IT department to keep up with thatgrowth. So we were forced into making sure that we had best practice by goingout into the market.

I think there will be a drive to outsource in the current environment. Thebig issue that is facing us all is the whole issue of risk management and Ithink people will want to bring in experts in a particular field ­ whatever itmaybe ­ to manage the risk. Without doubt that will become a driver.

I think it will force organisations to start looking at what services do theydo themselves and what do they do externally.

Chaired by Damian Wild

Watch the events and sign up atwww.insiderbusinessclub.com


Insider Business Club: mid-market outsourcing

Damian Wild, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 18:11:00

Whether it is to aid growth or cut costs, more businesses are turning tooutsourcing, according to our experts

Are mid-market companies embracing outsourcing and which finance servicesare being put out?

Mark Holland, partner, Baker Tilly and ICAEW IT faculty

I think it’s a trend that is growing. Mid-sized companies are seeing theopportunity now to benefit from the services, the efficiency gains, thereliability and the additional functionality that outsourcing can bring to themthat, perhaps, up until relatively recently, was only possible for their largercorporate colleagues.

There have been changes in the last few years in technology and in ways ofworking that mean those benefits are now far more accessible. Some businessesare taking up the opportunity, or at least looking at it.

Outsourcing has tended to be done more for positive reasons, i.e. growth anddevelopment, rather than purely as a cost-cutting exercise. I would beinterested to see whether, given the current environment, it continues to begrowth that is the key driver or whether cost cutting perhaps raises it.

With the commercial usage of the internet as it is now, it is possible forbusinesses and outsourcers to share the same information simultaneously whereas,in the past, outsourcing the finance function might have been a question ofbasically losing control over everything. You wouldn’t know anything until theset of reports hits your desk in a paper copy a week or two later.

Those days are over. Now what we are seeing is a collaborative approach, apartnership approach between the outsourced delivery company that is actuallydoing the final part of the finance function and the company that has outsourcedpart of that function.

The components that we are seeing outsourced are increasingly around some ofthe less value-added areas. For example, purchase ledger, reconciliation,preparation of management reports, KPI reports, that sort of thing. We tend notto see credit control being outsourced to such an extent because that istouching customers.

Are companies willing to outsource ‘core’ services?

Peter Simons, technical specialist, CIMA

I work with a forum of leading companies ­ we call them enterprise-sizedcompanies ­ and this has already happened in their area for some time now. WhenI talk to members about developments in the finance function and tell them thismay come down the line, they have been in denial.

But increasingly now there are anecdotes coming back from the audience insmaller mid-sized and even SME companies where they are saying: ‘Yes, this iswhat we are doing too.’ So it’s an exciting time for accountants.

People have no problem outsourcing their car fleet or outsourcing cateringthe canteen because they never saw that as being core. But what is interestingis that in the last few years, people have thought, well, maybe HR isn’t thatcore, IT isn’t that core and now they are saying that accounts are not thatcore.

That’s a shift because politically HR were probably weak at the board level,while IT are geeks ­ nobody understands what they do anyway. But finance used toalways be at the fore as something that people had to have at the board tableand previously they would not contemplate outsourcing that.

How can you best manage an outsourced service?

Keith Wilson, commercial director, BaxterStorey

We are a provider of outsourcing services ­ catering, reception services,etc. In our IT department we also outsource a lot of our services to supportcompanies. There is a variety of them, although we do have a central small hubthat manages those outsourced services.

I think that is key to make sure that you keep the control when you outsourcethe technical parts of a service.

It would probably be fair to say that it happened by accident, or happened byevolution. We have grown very rapidly. We have been going for seven years and wehave grown rapidly in that period of time.

It was therefore very difficult for our IT department to keep up with thatgrowth. So we were forced into making sure that we had best practice by goingout into the market.

I think there will be a drive to outsource in the current environment. Thebig issue that is facing us all is the whole issue of risk management and Ithink people will want to bring in experts in a particular field ­ whatever itmaybe ­ to manage the risk. Without doubt that will become a driver.

I think it will force organisations to start looking at what services do theydo themselves and what do they do externally.

Chaired by Damian Wild

Watch the events and sign up atwww.insiderbusinessclub.com


Profile: Steve Jones, FD of Rugby Estates

Judith Tydd, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 17:40:00

An inherent desire for steering a company’s finance strategy over nuts andbolts accounting has taken Rugby estates FD Steve Jones to the core of property investing

Steve Jones never entertained the prospect of being an accountant ­ theprofession held little attraction for a man more concerned with dictating theoverarching financial direction of a business.

Even now, he sees his role as an accountant as secondary to that of financedirector, with accountancy merely serving as a tool used in crafting a moretactical path.

For Jones, it’s about information management and comprehending numbers interms of the here and now, but also how he prepares a business for the future.

‘I’ve always been more focused on playing an important role in the running ofa business. I’ve never liked numbers for numbers sake ­ it’s not just whereyou’ve been but also where you’re going,’ he says.

After university he took on a role at BTR, the forerunner to Invensys, amanufacturing company producing everything from oil rigs to conveyor belts.

His two year tenure was in a financial analyst role, but his departure cameon the assertion that ‘the company’s view of cost control failed to translate tomy view of salary’.

Not content with settling for a career as a ‘factory accountant’, and cravingdiversity and responsibility, an offer at Wiggins Group plc facilitated both ofthese.

He quickly learned the basic infrastructure and accounting function to be a‘complete shambles’, but concedes the opportunity to restore some financialhealth to the business was a task to be savoured. ‘I got down to the grunt workof actually building financial reporting teams and structure and policies. I’dliterally be sitting at home on a Sunday night writing up the cash box. It washands on…I saw it as something I could get my teeth into,’ he says.

After four years with Wiggins, Jones left as group financial controller afterhe struggled to accept where the group was heading strategically.

Enter Rugby Securities, then part of a larger parent called HillsdownHoldings plc and member of the FTSE 100, way back in 1986. Rugby Securities wasa property dealing subsidiary run autonomously to Hillsdown, and as Jonesrecalls, the independence allowed him scope to develop

a finance function on his own terms.

‘As long as I sent my numbers in each month that was about it…they justprovided the finance,’ he says.

Rugby Securities employed about a dozen people at the start of Jones’appointment, turning over between £1m and £2m a year profit. Soon it gatheredpace amid the late 1980s boom, taking on close to 30 employees and recordingannual profits in excess of £20m.

His Wiggins term inadvertently acted as an overture to what unfolded in therecession of the early 1990s and as co-founding director of Rugby SecuritiesLimited ­ - now justRugby Estates ­ -Jones is ostensibly well-placed to cope with the current crisis.

According to Jones, the overarching philosophy adopted by Rugby Estates liesin purchasing property where they can add value, and despite being outbid bymore risk-laden buyers on a number of occasions, the business has maintained itsapproach to the market, largely because he’s set to lose more than most. ‘It’sour own money tied up in the business,’ he says.

Having lived through the recession of the early 90s, he’s confident he cannavigate the business through the chaos but is reticent on how much furtherthere is to fall. ‘We’re actually in a strong position, although there are notransactions . . . as we are in the middle of peak uncertainty,’ explains Jones.

While in the midst of the downturn and ‘peak uncertainty’, he’s afforded thetime to look at opportunities beyond the storm, which he says, lies in thirdparty businesses.

Corporate value in the property sector has fallen significantly, about 20% incommercial property from the peak of 2007.

Business buffer

After years of debt-fuelled buying by investors, one consolation for Jonesand Co is the fact the business was not geared too highly and they instead builtit on plain, vanilla-type deals at approximately 70% of a property’s value. Inpart, its prudence provides a buffer to the business in stymieing furtherimpacts from the unprecedented fallout in global markets.

‘There was too much lending going on, on too high terms.’

As an investment vehicle, Rugby Estates plc was established by David Tye andDavid Wilson, along with Jones, and was designed as an offshoot to RugbySecurities.

In 1994 they floated on the London Stock Exchange; a time when interest ratesdropped to 8% and property yields followed suit.

The trio used the prevailing boom period as an opportunity to shy away fromthe parent company and emerge as a fully-independent public company. ‘It was anatural consequence. In the early 1990s Hillsdown had a lot of demergers andthere wasn’t an obvious logical place for us,’ he says.

Readily conceding transactions are at a premium for most players in thespace, Jones won’t be drawn on the degree of downsizing, if any, that hasoccurred in the past 12 months.

The commitment to a property development transaction is the ultimate judgmentin a business of this nature, and companies across the board are settling forconservatism and reining in risk, however minor.

The structure of the business’ property investment vehicles isthree-dimensional, including the ING Covent Garden Limited Partnership,established in 2002 and comprising a £200m portfolio, and OTwelve EstatesLimited, which was set up in 2006.

The latter vehicle has now built up a £250m portfolio of properties in theeast of London which are set to benefit from infrastructure improvements in thelead up to the 2012 London Olympic Games.

Soon after London won the bid, Jones and the team set upon investing inincome-developing East London property development.

The third and final vehicle is the Rugby Estates Investment, built on theconcept of a Real Estate Investment Trust which provides favourable taxtreatment to the investor.

Rugby Estates buys private companies which, says Jones, come with a ‘readymade exit’, and have recorded three REIT acquisitions since the UK governmenteffectively adopted the regime last year.

While the likelihood of generating such a deal now is slim, Jones isconfident the concept is a potentially lucrative option and is keen to revisitprospective sales once the market lifts.

Core to securing a REIT deal is sourcing companies of interest, and he’susing this cooling off period to locate and contact suitable prospects. Leadsare often generated by legal firms, property surveyors and contacts within theaccountancy profession.

Transaction might not take place right now, but good contacts could securedeals when the market picks up.

‘We need to meet more people…now is not the time [for deals], but maybe inone or two years...’

The REIT state of play

Rugby Estates plc has joined a growing list of companies to adopt REIT statusas a viable investment vehicle.

While the concept launched in the US in 1970, it took the much longer for theUK government to be convinced of its merits.

After decades of lobbying, UK-based businesses have only been able to takeadvantage of REITs since becoming effective in 2007, when the governmentrecognised they could generate tax from this type of vehicle. It was enacted inthe Finance Act of 2006.

There’s an upfront tax payment on the behalf of the investor â€" 2% of thevalue of a property goes into the REIT regime. Historically, capital gains taxwould be extinguished and the Treasury wouldn’t see any of the tax until theproperty sold. Because the regime was legislated at the peak of the market, thegovernment is thought to have gained substantially from its offering.

UK REITs are required to distribute 90% of their income and can be classifiedas equity, mortgage or hybrid. They also have the capacity to be publicly orprivately held.

More recently, Enterprise Inns has reportedly deferred adopting REIT statusbecause of unforgiving economic conditions. The pub owner’s banks have agreed inprincipal to fund the REIT conversion. It’s believed to be a syndicate of 10 to12 institutions remaining largely unaffected by the credit crunch.


Profile: Steve Jones, FD of Rugby Estates

Judith Tydd, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 17:40:00

An inherent desire for steering a company’s finance strategy over nuts andbolts accounting has taken Rugby estates FD Steve Jones to the core of property investing

Steve Jones never entertained the prospect of being an accountant ­ theprofession held little attraction for a man more concerned with dictating theoverarching financial direction of a business.

Even now, he sees his role as an accountant as secondary to that of financedirector, with accountancy merely serving as a tool used in crafting a moretactical path.

For Jones, it’s about information management and comprehending numbers interms of the here and now, but also how he prepares a business for the future.

‘I’ve always been more focused on playing an important role in the running ofa business. I’ve never liked numbers for numbers sake ­ it’s not just whereyou’ve been but also where you’re going,’ he says.

After university he took on a role at BTR, the forerunner to Invensys, amanufacturing company producing everything from oil rigs to conveyor belts.

His two year tenure was in a financial analyst role, but his departure cameon the assertion that ‘the company’s view of cost control failed to translate tomy view of salary’.

Not content with settling for a career as a ‘factory accountant’, and cravingdiversity and responsibility, an offer at Wiggins Group plc facilitated both ofthese.

He quickly learned the basic infrastructure and accounting function to be a‘complete shambles’, but concedes the opportunity to restore some financialhealth to the business was a task to be savoured. ‘I got down to the grunt workof actually building financial reporting teams and structure and policies. I’dliterally be sitting at home on a Sunday night writing up the cash box. It washands on…I saw it as something I could get my teeth into,’ he says.

After four years with Wiggins, Jones left as group financial controller afterhe struggled to accept where the group was heading strategically.

Enter Rugby Securities, then part of a larger parent called HillsdownHoldings plc and member of the FTSE 100, way back in 1986. Rugby Securities wasa property dealing subsidiary run autonomously to Hillsdown, and as Jonesrecalls, the independence allowed him scope to develop

a finance function on his own terms.

‘As long as I sent my numbers in each month that was about it…they justprovided the finance,’ he says.

Rugby Securities employed about a dozen people at the start of Jones’appointment, turning over between £1m and £2m a year profit. Soon it gatheredpace amid the late 1980s boom, taking on close to 30 employees and recordingannual profits in excess of £20m.

His Wiggins term inadvertently acted as an overture to what unfolded in therecession of the early 1990s and as co-founding director of Rugby SecuritiesLimited ­ - now justRugby Estates ­ -Jones is ostensibly well-placed to cope with the current crisis.

According to Jones, the overarching philosophy adopted by Rugby Estates liesin purchasing property where they can add value, and despite being outbid bymore risk-laden buyers on a number of occasions, the business has maintained itsapproach to the market, largely because he’s set to lose more than most. ‘It’sour own money tied up in the business,’ he says.

Having lived through the recession of the early 90s, he’s confident he cannavigate the business through the chaos but is reticent on how much furtherthere is to fall. ‘We’re actually in a strong position, although there are notransactions . . . as we are in the middle of peak uncertainty,’ explains Jones.

While in the midst of the downturn and ‘peak uncertainty’, he’s afforded thetime to look at opportunities beyond the storm, which he says, lies in thirdparty businesses.

Corporate value in the property sector has fallen significantly, about 20% incommercial property from the peak of 2007.

Business buffer

After years of debt-fuelled buying by investors, one consolation for Jonesand Co is the fact the business was not geared too highly and they instead builtit on plain, vanilla-type deals at approximately 70% of a property’s value. Inpart, its prudence provides a buffer to the business in stymieing furtherimpacts from the unprecedented fallout in global markets.

‘There was too much lending going on, on too high terms.’

As an investment vehicle, Rugby Estates plc was established by David Tye andDavid Wilson, along with Jones, and was designed as an offshoot to RugbySecurities.

In 1994 they floated on the London Stock Exchange; a time when interest ratesdropped to 8% and property yields followed suit.

The trio used the prevailing boom period as an opportunity to shy away fromthe parent company and emerge as a fully-independent public company. ‘It was anatural consequence. In the early 1990s Hillsdown had a lot of demergers andthere wasn’t an obvious logical place for us,’ he says.

Readily conceding transactions are at a premium for most players in thespace, Jones won’t be drawn on the degree of downsizing, if any, that hasoccurred in the past 12 months.

The commitment to a property development transaction is the ultimate judgmentin a business of this nature, and companies across the board are settling forconservatism and reining in risk, however minor.

The structure of the business’ property investment vehicles isthree-dimensional, including the ING Covent Garden Limited Partnership,established in 2002 and comprising a £200m portfolio, and OTwelve EstatesLimited, which was set up in 2006.

The latter vehicle has now built up a £250m portfolio of properties in theeast of London which are set to benefit from infrastructure improvements in thelead up to the 2012 London Olympic Games.

Soon after London won the bid, Jones and the team set upon investing inincome-developing East London property development.

The third and final vehicle is the Rugby Estates Investment, built on theconcept of a Real Estate Investment Trust which provides favourable taxtreatment to the investor.

Rugby Estates buys private companies which, says Jones, come with a ‘readymade exit’, and have recorded three REIT acquisitions since the UK governmenteffectively adopted the regime last year.

While the likelihood of generating such a deal now is slim, Jones isconfident the concept is a potentially lucrative option and is keen to revisitprospective sales once the market lifts.

Core to securing a REIT deal is sourcing companies of interest, and he’susing this cooling off period to locate and contact suitable prospects. Leadsare often generated by legal firms, property surveyors and contacts within theaccountancy profession.

Transaction might not take place right now, but good contacts could securedeals when the market picks up.

‘We need to meet more people…now is not the time [for deals], but maybe inone or two years...’

The REIT state of play

Rugby Estates plc has joined a growing list of companies to adopt REIT statusas a viable investment vehicle.

While the concept launched in the US in 1970, it took the much longer for theUK government to be convinced of its merits.

After decades of lobbying, UK-based businesses have only been able to takeadvantage of REITs since becoming effective in 2007, when the governmentrecognised they could generate tax from this type of vehicle. It was enacted inthe Finance Act of 2006.

There’s an upfront tax payment on the behalf of the investor â€" 2% of thevalue of a property goes into the REIT regime. Historically, capital gains taxwould be extinguished and the Treasury wouldn’t see any of the tax until theproperty sold. Because the regime was legislated at the peak of the market, thegovernment is thought to have gained substantially from its offering.

UK REITs are required to distribute 90% of their income and can be classifiedas equity, mortgage or hybrid. They also have the capacity to be publicly orprivately held.

More recently, Enterprise Inns has reportedly deferred adopting REIT statusbecause of unforgiving economic conditions. The pub owner’s banks have agreed inprincipal to fund the REIT conversion. It’s believed to be a syndicate of 10 to12 institutions remaining largely unaffected by the credit crunch.


Profile: Steve Jones, FD of Rugby Estates

Judith Tydd, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 17:40:00

An inherent desire for steering a company’s finance strategy over nuts andbolts accounting has taken Rugby estates FD Steve Jones to the core of property investing

Steve Jones never entertained the prospect of being an accountant ­ theprofession held little attraction for a man more concerned with dictating theoverarching financial direction of a business.

Even now, he sees his role as an accountant as secondary to that of financedirector, with accountancy merely serving as a tool used in crafting a moretactical path.

For Jones, it’s about information management and comprehending numbers interms of the here and now, but also how he prepares a business for the future.

‘I’ve always been more focused on playing an important role in the running ofa business. I’ve never liked numbers for numbers sake ­ it’s not just whereyou’ve been but also where you’re going,’ he says.

After university he took on a role at BTR, the forerunner to Invensys, amanufacturing company producing everything from oil rigs to conveyor belts.

His two year tenure was in a financial analyst role, but his departure cameon the assertion that ‘the company’s view of cost control failed to translate tomy view of salary’.

Not content with settling for a career as a ‘factory accountant’, and cravingdiversity and responsibility, an offer at Wiggins Group plc facilitated both ofthese.

He quickly learned the basic infrastructure and accounting function to be a‘complete shambles’, but concedes the opportunity to restore some financialhealth to the business was a task to be savoured. ‘I got down to the grunt workof actually building financial reporting teams and structure and policies. I’dliterally be sitting at home on a Sunday night writing up the cash box. It washands on…I saw it as something I could get my teeth into,’ he says.

After four years with Wiggins, Jones left as group financial controller afterhe struggled to accept where the group was heading strategically.

Enter Rugby Securities, then part of a larger parent called HillsdownHoldings plc and member of the FTSE 100, way back in 1986. Rugby Securities wasa property dealing subsidiary run autonomously to Hillsdown, and as Jonesrecalls, the independence allowed him scope to develop

a finance function on his own terms.

‘As long as I sent my numbers in each month that was about it…they justprovided the finance,’ he says.

Rugby Securities employed about a dozen people at the start of Jones’appointment, turning over between £1m and £2m a year profit. Soon it gatheredpace amid the late 1980s boom, taking on close to 30 employees and recordingannual profits in excess of £20m.

His Wiggins term inadvertently acted as an overture to what unfolded in therecession of the early 1990s and as co-founding director of Rugby SecuritiesLimited ­ - now justRugby Estates ­ -Jones is ostensibly well-placed to cope with the current crisis.

According to Jones, the overarching philosophy adopted by Rugby Estates liesin purchasing property where they can add value, and despite being outbid bymore risk-laden buyers on a number of occasions, the business has maintained itsapproach to the market, largely because he’s set to lose more than most. ‘It’sour own money tied up in the business,’ he says.

Having lived through the recession of the early 90s, he’s confident he cannavigate the business through the chaos but is reticent on how much furtherthere is to fall. ‘We’re actually in a strong position, although there are notransactions . . . as we are in the middle of peak uncertainty,’ explains Jones.

While in the midst of the downturn and ‘peak uncertainty’, he’s afforded thetime to look at opportunities beyond the storm, which he says, lies in thirdparty businesses.

Corporate value in the property sector has fallen significantly, about 20% incommercial property from the peak of 2007.

Business buffer

After years of debt-fuelled buying by investors, one consolation for Jonesand Co is the fact the business was not geared too highly and they instead builtit on plain, vanilla-type deals at approximately 70% of a property’s value. Inpart, its prudence provides a buffer to the business in stymieing furtherimpacts from the unprecedented fallout in global markets.

‘There was too much lending going on, on too high terms.’

As an investment vehicle, Rugby Estates plc was established by David Tye andDavid Wilson, along with Jones, and was designed as an offshoot to RugbySecurities.

In 1994 they floated on the London Stock Exchange; a time when interest ratesdropped to 8% and property yields followed suit.

The trio used the prevailing boom period as an opportunity to shy away fromthe parent company and emerge as a fully-independent public company. ‘It was anatural consequence. In the early 1990s Hillsdown had a lot of demergers andthere wasn’t an obvious logical place for us,’ he says.

Readily conceding transactions are at a premium for most players in thespace, Jones won’t be drawn on the degree of downsizing, if any, that hasoccurred in the past 12 months.

The commitment to a property development transaction is the ultimate judgmentin a business of this nature, and companies across the board are settling forconservatism and reining in risk, however minor.

The structure of the business’ property investment vehicles isthree-dimensional, including the ING Covent Garden Limited Partnership,established in 2002 and comprising a £200m portfolio, and OTwelve EstatesLimited, which was set up in 2006.

The latter vehicle has now built up a £250m portfolio of properties in theeast of London which are set to benefit from infrastructure improvements in thelead up to the 2012 London Olympic Games.

Soon after London won the bid, Jones and the team set upon investing inincome-developing East London property development.

The third and final vehicle is the Rugby Estates Investment, built on theconcept of a Real Estate Investment Trust which provides favourable taxtreatment to the investor.

Rugby Estates buys private companies which, says Jones, come with a ‘readymade exit’, and have recorded three REIT acquisitions since the UK governmenteffectively adopted the regime last year.

While the likelihood of generating such a deal now is slim, Jones isconfident the concept is a potentially lucrative option and is keen to revisitprospective sales once the market lifts.

Core to securing a REIT deal is sourcing companies of interest, and he’susing this cooling off period to locate and contact suitable prospects. Leadsare often generated by legal firms, property surveyors and contacts within theaccountancy profession.

Transaction might not take place right now, but good contacts could securedeals when the market picks up.

‘We need to meet more people…now is not the time [for deals], but maybe inone or two years...’

The REIT state of play

Rugby Estates plc has joined a growing list of companies to adopt REIT statusas a viable investment vehicle.

While the concept launched in the US in 1970, it took the much longer for theUK government to be convinced of its merits.

After decades of lobbying, UK-based businesses have only been able to takeadvantage of REITs since becoming effective in 2007, when the governmentrecognised they could generate tax from this type of vehicle. It was enacted inthe Finance Act of 2006.

There’s an upfront tax payment on the behalf of the investor â€" 2% of thevalue of a property goes into the REIT regime. Historically, capital gains taxwould be extinguished and the Treasury wouldn’t see any of the tax until theproperty sold. Because the regime was legislated at the peak of the market, thegovernment is thought to have gained substantially from its offering.

UK REITs are required to distribute 90% of their income and can be classifiedas equity, mortgage or hybrid. They also have the capacity to be publicly orprivately held.

More recently, Enterprise Inns has reportedly deferred adopting REIT statusbecause of unforgiving economic conditions. The pub owner’s banks have agreed inprincipal to fund the REIT conversion. It’s believed to be a syndicate of 10 to12 institutions remaining largely unaffected by the credit crunch.


Profile: Steve Jones, FD of Rugby Estates

Judith Tydd, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 17:40:00

An inherent desire for steering a company’s finance strategy over nuts andbolts accounting has taken Rugby estates FD Steve Jones to the core of property investing

Steve Jones never entertained the prospect of being an accountant ­ theprofession held little attraction for a man more concerned with dictating theoverarching financial direction of a business.

Even now, he sees his role as an accountant as secondary to that of financedirector, with accountancy merely serving as a tool used in crafting a moretactical path.

For Jones, it’s about information management and comprehending numbers interms of the here and now, but also how he prepares a business for the future.

‘I’ve always been more focused on playing an important role in the running ofa business. I’ve never liked numbers for numbers sake ­ it’s not just whereyou’ve been but also where you’re going,’ he says.

After university he took on a role at BTR, the forerunner to Invensys, amanufacturing company producing everything from oil rigs to conveyor belts.

His two year tenure was in a financial analyst role, but his departure cameon the assertion that ‘the company’s view of cost control failed to translate tomy view of salary’.

Not content with settling for a career as a ‘factory accountant’, and cravingdiversity and responsibility, an offer at Wiggins Group plc facilitated both ofthese.

He quickly learned the basic infrastructure and accounting function to be a‘complete shambles’, but concedes the opportunity to restore some financialhealth to the business was a task to be savoured. ‘I got down to the grunt workof actually building financial reporting teams and structure and policies. I’dliterally be sitting at home on a Sunday night writing up the cash box. It washands on…I saw it as something I could get my teeth into,’ he says.

After four years with Wiggins, Jones left as group financial controller afterhe struggled to accept where the group was heading strategically.

Enter Rugby Securities, then part of a larger parent called HillsdownHoldings plc and member of the FTSE 100, way back in 1986. Rugby Securities wasa property dealing subsidiary run autonomously to Hillsdown, and as Jonesrecalls, the independence allowed him scope to develop

a finance function on his own terms.

‘As long as I sent my numbers in each month that was about it…they justprovided the finance,’ he says.

Rugby Securities employed about a dozen people at the start of Jones’appointment, turning over between £1m and £2m a year profit. Soon it gatheredpace amid the late 1980s boom, taking on close to 30 employees and recordingannual profits in excess of £20m.

His Wiggins term inadvertently acted as an overture to what unfolded in therecession of the early 1990s and as co-founding director of Rugby SecuritiesLimited ­ - now justRugby Estates ­ -Jones is ostensibly well-placed to cope with the current crisis.

According to Jones, the overarching philosophy adopted by Rugby Estates liesin purchasing property where they can add value, and despite being outbid bymore risk-laden buyers on a number of occasions, the business has maintained itsapproach to the market, largely because he’s set to lose more than most. ‘It’sour own money tied up in the business,’ he says.

Having lived through the recession of the early 90s, he’s confident he cannavigate the business through the chaos but is reticent on how much furtherthere is to fall. ‘We’re actually in a strong position, although there are notransactions . . . as we are in the middle of peak uncertainty,’ explains Jones.

While in the midst of the downturn and ‘peak uncertainty’, he’s afforded thetime to look at opportunities beyond the storm, which he says, lies in thirdparty businesses.

Corporate value in the property sector has fallen significantly, about 20% incommercial property from the peak of 2007.

Business buffer

After years of debt-fuelled buying by investors, one consolation for Jonesand Co is the fact the business was not geared too highly and they instead builtit on plain, vanilla-type deals at approximately 70% of a property’s value. Inpart, its prudence provides a buffer to the business in stymieing furtherimpacts from the unprecedented fallout in global markets.

‘There was too much lending going on, on too high terms.’

As an investment vehicle, Rugby Estates plc was established by David Tye andDavid Wilson, along with Jones, and was designed as an offshoot to RugbySecurities.

In 1994 they floated on the London Stock Exchange; a time when interest ratesdropped to 8% and property yields followed suit.

The trio used the prevailing boom period as an opportunity to shy away fromthe parent company and emerge as a fully-independent public company. ‘It was anatural consequence. In the early 1990s Hillsdown had a lot of demergers andthere wasn’t an obvious logical place for us,’ he says.

Readily conceding transactions are at a premium for most players in thespace, Jones won’t be drawn on the degree of downsizing, if any, that hasoccurred in the past 12 months.

The commitment to a property development transaction is the ultimate judgmentin a business of this nature, and companies across the board are settling forconservatism and reining in risk, however minor.

The structure of the business’ property investment vehicles isthree-dimensional, including the ING Covent Garden Limited Partnership,established in 2002 and comprising a £200m portfolio, and OTwelve EstatesLimited, which was set up in 2006.

The latter vehicle has now built up a £250m portfolio of properties in theeast of London which are set to benefit from infrastructure improvements in thelead up to the 2012 London Olympic Games.

Soon after London won the bid, Jones and the team set upon investing inincome-developing East London property development.

The third and final vehicle is the Rugby Estates Investment, built on theconcept of a Real Estate Investment Trust which provides favourable taxtreatment to the investor.

Rugby Estates buys private companies which, says Jones, come with a ‘readymade exit’, and have recorded three REIT acquisitions since the UK governmenteffectively adopted the regime last year.

While the likelihood of generating such a deal now is slim, Jones isconfident the concept is a potentially lucrative option and is keen to revisitprospective sales once the market lifts.

Core to securing a REIT deal is sourcing companies of interest, and he’susing this cooling off period to locate and contact suitable prospects. Leadsare often generated by legal firms, property surveyors and contacts within theaccountancy profession.

Transaction might not take place right now, but good contacts could securedeals when the market picks up.

‘We need to meet more people…now is not the time [for deals], but maybe inone or two years...’

The REIT state of play

Rugby Estates plc has joined a growing list of companies to adopt REIT statusas a viable investment vehicle.

While the concept launched in the US in 1970, it took the much longer for theUK government to be convinced of its merits.

After decades of lobbying, UK-based businesses have only been able to takeadvantage of REITs since becoming effective in 2007, when the governmentrecognised they could generate tax from this type of vehicle. It was enacted inthe Finance Act of 2006.

There’s an upfront tax payment on the behalf of the investor â€" 2% of thevalue of a property goes into the REIT regime. Historically, capital gains taxwould be extinguished and the Treasury wouldn’t see any of the tax until theproperty sold. Because the regime was legislated at the peak of the market, thegovernment is thought to have gained substantially from its offering.

UK REITs are required to distribute 90% of their income and can be classifiedas equity, mortgage or hybrid. They also have the capacity to be publicly orprivately held.

More recently, Enterprise Inns has reportedly deferred adopting REIT statusbecause of unforgiving economic conditions. The pub owner’s banks have agreed inprincipal to fund the REIT conversion. It’s believed to be a syndicate of 10 to12 institutions remaining largely unaffected by the credit crunch.


Barton snaps up Sister Ray

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 13:01:00

Co-founder of independent music retailer buys back the company out ofadministration

Phil Barton, the co-founder of independent music retailer Sister Ray hasbought the shop out of administration.

Barton formed a new company, Sister Ray 08 Ltd, to buy the independentretailer, which went into administration in July,MusicWeek reported.

The sale will mean no job cuts at Sister Ray, said Andy Pear, the companyadministrator appointed from Tenon Recovery.


AATV: Green business travel

Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 10:20:00

Andrew Marris of dcarbon8 provides his tips for the greenest business travel

Andrew Marris, chief executive of dcarbonate, explains how companies canreduce their carbon footprint significantly when employees are travelling forbusiness.


AATV: Green business travel

Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 10:20:00

Andrew Marris of dcarbon8 provides his tips for the greenest business travel

Andrew Marris, chief executive of dcarbonate, explains how companies canreduce their carbon footprint significantly when employees are travelling forbusiness.


AATV: Green business travel

Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 10:20:00

Andrew Marris of dcarbon8 provides his tips for the greenest business travel

Andrew Marris, chief executive of dcarbonate, explains how companies canreduce their carbon footprint significantly when employees are travelling forbusiness.


Insolvency body aims to beef-up council's powers

David Jetuah , Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 10:15:00

Leading trade body R3 to increase its council's powers, expulsing errantinsolvency practitioners

Errant insolvency practitioners will risk expulsion from leading trade bodyR3 as part of a move to increase its council’s powers.

An emergency general meeting later this month will vote on a raft of changesto meet the demands of the Companies Act and bring it into line with otherbodies.

‘[R3 has] decided it is appropriate to have clearly defined powers to removesomeone from our membership, subject to defining a suitable, underpinning andfair process,’ R3 said in an EGM notice seen by AccountancyAge.

‘There may be occasions, unrelated to a regulator withdrawing a licence, forexample, where we might consider continued membership of R3 was inconsistentwith the way an individual was acting.’

Another significant change will see chief operating officer Graham Rumneycrowned R3’s first chief executive, which more accurately reflects his role, thebody said.

R3 President Nick O’Reilly said: ‘These proposed changes are in line withrequirements of the Companies Act and better reflect R3’s position as it is nowand will be for the next five to10 years.’


Insolvency body aims to beef-up council's powers

David Jetuah , Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 10:15:00

Leading trade body R3 to increase its council's powers, expulsing errantinsolvency practitioners

Errant insolvency practitioners will risk expulsion from leading trade bodyR3 as part of a move to increase its council’s powers.

An emergency general meeting later this month will vote on a raft of changesto meet the demands of the Companies Act and bring it into line with otherbodies.

‘[R3 has] decided it is appropriate to have clearly defined powers to removesomeone from our membership, subject to defining a suitable, underpinning andfair process,’ R3 said in an EGM notice seen by AccountancyAge.

‘There may be occasions, unrelated to a regulator withdrawing a licence, forexample, where we might consider continued membership of R3 was inconsistentwith the way an individual was acting.’

Another significant change will see chief operating officer Graham Rumneycrowned R3’s first chief executive, which more accurately reflects his role, thebody said.

R3 President Nick O’Reilly said: ‘These proposed changes are in line withrequirements of the Companies Act and better reflect R3’s position as it is nowand will be for the next five to10 years.’


Insolvency body aims to beef-up council's powers

David Jetuah , Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 10:15:00

Leading trade body R3 to increase its council's powers, expulsing errantinsolvency practitioners

Errant insolvency practitioners will risk expulsion from leading trade bodyR3 as part of a move to increase its council’s powers.

An emergency general meeting later this month will vote on a raft of changesto meet the demands of the Companies Act and bring it into line with otherbodies.

‘[R3 has] decided it is appropriate to have clearly defined powers to removesomeone from our membership, subject to defining a suitable, underpinning andfair process,’ R3 said in an EGM notice seen by AccountancyAge.

‘There may be occasions, unrelated to a regulator withdrawing a licence, forexample, where we might consider continued membership of R3 was inconsistentwith the way an individual was acting.’

Another significant change will see chief operating officer Graham Rumneycrowned R3’s first chief executive, which more accurately reflects his role, thebody said.

R3 President Nick O’Reilly said: ‘These proposed changes are in line withrequirements of the Companies Act and better reflect R3’s position as it is nowand will be for the next five to10 years.’


KPMG in crunch talks with JJB bankers

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 09:48:00

Struggling sportswear outlet calls in the accountants to negotiate with itsbankers concerning £95m of loans

JJB has called in KPMG to negotiate with its bankers, as the strugglingsports company tries to keep its head above water.

The talks will centre on £95m of loans that the company has taken out, theGuardianreported.

Earlier this month auditors Deloitte raised doubts that JJB could carry on asa going concern in the sports chain's interim results statement.

Further reading:

JJBsports interim results statement


KPMG in crunch talks with JJB bankers

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 09:48:00

Struggling sportswear outlet calls in the accountants to negotiate with itsbankers concerning £95m of loans

JJB has called in KPMG to negotiate with its bankers, as the strugglingsports company tries to keep its head above water.

The talks will centre on £95m of loans that the company has taken out, theGuardianreported.

Earlier this month auditors Deloitte raised doubts that JJB could carry on asa going concern in the sports chain's interim results statement.

Further reading:

JJBsports interim results statement


KPMG in crunch talks with JJB bankers

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 09:48:00

Struggling sportswear outlet calls in the accountants to negotiate with itsbankers concerning £95m of loans

JJB has called in KPMG to negotiate with its bankers, as the strugglingsports company tries to keep its head above water.

The talks will centre on £95m of loans that the company has taken out, theGuardianreported.

Earlier this month auditors Deloitte raised doubts that JJB could carry on asa going concern in the sports chain's interim results statement.

Further reading:

JJBsports interim results statement


Banks fury as ACCA chief blames crunch on boards

Gavin Hinks, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 08:18:00

ACCA president angers banks accusing them of being the root cause of thecredit crunch

Angry bankers have complained directly toACCA about comments byits president Richard Aitken-Davies, who they say accused banks and their boardsof being the root cause of the credit crunch.

The comments came in the middle of efforts last week to stave off thecollapse of the world banking system and were distributed alongside an ACCAdiscussion paper called Climbing out of the credit crunch.

A spokesperson for the British Bankers Association this week confirmed theyhad approached ACCA to remonstrate in relation to comments made aboutthe‘transparency’ of banks.

‘This is a global financial issue. It’s not only the fault of banks,’ saidthe BBA spokesperson. She added: ‘Accountants were the people who audited thebanks’ books’.

In ACCA’s statement, Aitken-Davies said: ‘The fundamental responsibilities ofa corporate board appear to have been inadequately discharged. We need to askwhat inhibited banks’ boards from asking the right questions and understandingthe risks that were being run by their managements.’

The BBA made clear that it believed the report from ACCA had been useful buttook exception to the tone of Aitken-Davies’ remarks, prompting the spat.

ACCA said views expressed in the press by Aitken-Davies were his own‘strongly’ held opinions and the paper clearly laid out the institute’sposition.


Banks fury as ACCA chief blames crunch on boards

Gavin Hinks, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 08:18:00

ACCA president angers banks accusing them of being the root cause of thecredit crunch

Angry bankers have complained directly toACCA about comments byits president Richard Aitken-Davies, who they say accused banks and their boardsof being the root cause of the credit crunch.

The comments came in the middle of efforts last week to stave off thecollapse of the world banking system and were distributed alongside an ACCAdiscussion paper called Climbing out of the credit crunch.

A spokesperson for the British Bankers Association this week confirmed theyhad approached ACCA to remonstrate in relation to comments made aboutthe‘transparency’ of banks.

‘This is a global financial issue. It’s not only the fault of banks,’ saidthe BBA spokesperson. She added: ‘Accountants were the people who audited thebanks’ books’.

In ACCA’s statement, Aitken-Davies said: ‘The fundamental responsibilities ofa corporate board appear to have been inadequately discharged. We need to askwhat inhibited banks’ boards from asking the right questions and understandingthe risks that were being run by their managements.’

The BBA made clear that it believed the report from ACCA had been useful buttook exception to the tone of Aitken-Davies’ remarks, prompting the spat.

ACCA said views expressed in the press by Aitken-Davies were his own‘strongly’ held opinions and the paper clearly laid out the institute’sposition.


Banks fury as ACCA chief blames crunch on boards

Gavin Hinks, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 08:18:00

ACCA president angers banks accusing them of being the root cause of thecredit crunch

Angry bankers have complained directly toACCA about comments byits president Richard Aitken-Davies, who they say accused banks and their boardsof being the root cause of the credit crunch.

The comments came in the middle of efforts last week to stave off thecollapse of the world banking system and were distributed alongside an ACCAdiscussion paper called Climbing out of the credit crunch.

A spokesperson for the British Bankers Association this week confirmed theyhad approached ACCA to remonstrate in relation to comments made aboutthe‘transparency’ of banks.

‘This is a global financial issue. It’s not only the fault of banks,’ saidthe BBA spokesperson. She added: ‘Accountants were the people who audited thebanks’ books’.

In ACCA’s statement, Aitken-Davies said: ‘The fundamental responsibilities ofa corporate board appear to have been inadequately discharged. We need to askwhat inhibited banks’ boards from asking the right questions and understandingthe risks that were being run by their managements.’

The BBA made clear that it believed the report from ACCA had been useful buttook exception to the tone of Aitken-Davies’ remarks, prompting the spat.

ACCA said views expressed in the press by Aitken-Davies were his own‘strongly’ held opinions and the paper clearly laid out the institute’sposition.


Sovereign funds look to placate their critics

Nick Huber, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 08:16:00

Pledge of more transparency and accountability from sovereign funds

Sovereign wealth funds have pledged to be more open and accountable, in apitch to win over Western critics.

The wealth funds ­ estimated to hold assets worth more than $3trillion andtypically owned by resource-rich countries, including China and the oil richcountries in the Middle East ­ have bought stakes in companies includingCitigroup and UBS, while Zabeel investments has made an indicative offer forCharlton AthleticFootball Club.

Politicians have expressed concerns that the funds are not transparent enoughand may invest in Western companies for political, not economic goals.

The International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds agreed voluntaryprinciples at the weekend. The Santiago principles, named after the city inwhich they were drafted, include a call on wealth funds to have a transparentand sound governance structure, to comply with regulatory and disclosurerequirements in countries in which they invest and maintain a stable financialsystem.

Jerry Leamon, Deloitte global managing partner, said the agreement was a‘significant step in the right direction’ that would help promote betterunderstanding of sovereign wealth funds.


Sovereign funds look to placate their critics

Nick Huber, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 08:16:00

Pledge of more transparency and accountability from sovereign funds

Sovereign wealth funds have pledged to be more open and accountable, in apitch to win over Western critics.

The wealth funds ­ estimated to hold assets worth more than $3trillion andtypically owned by resource-rich countries, including China and the oil richcountries in the Middle East ­ have bought stakes in companies includingCitigroup and UBS, while Zabeel investments has made an indicative offer forCharlton AthleticFootball Club.

Politicians have expressed concerns that the funds are not transparent enoughand may invest in Western companies for political, not economic goals.

The International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds agreed voluntaryprinciples at the weekend. The Santiago principles, named after the city inwhich they were drafted, include a call on wealth funds to have a transparentand sound governance structure, to comply with regulatory and disclosurerequirements in countries in which they invest and maintain a stable financialsystem.

Jerry Leamon, Deloitte global managing partner, said the agreement was a‘significant step in the right direction’ that would help promote betterunderstanding of sovereign wealth funds.


Firms braced for crunch claims

Nick Huber, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 08:08:00

Litigation experts warn firms that they could be sued over their roles in thepackaging up of US sub-prime mortgage assets

Firms could be vulnerable to law suits over their role in credit crunchrelated securitisations, lawyers have warned, as the profession braces itselffor any exposure it may have to the global financial crisis.

Litigation experts have warned that firms could be sued over their roles inthe packaging up of US sub-prime mortgage assets, which triggered the crisis.

Separately, lawyers have warned companies to be wary of firms trying to useliability limitation procedures to try and limit claims for prior year audits.

Nik Yeo, a specialist in finance litigation at barristers’Fountain CourtChambers, Temple, said accountants who had assisted banks in the design oraudit of structured financial

products may be vulnerable to legal action. ‘A firm who has put their name toeven part of an offering document could be in the firing line depending on whatthey attested to,’ he said.

Lawyers suggested that there is no sign of major litigation coming through,but many believe it is just a question of when rather than if.

Chris Warren-Smith, partner at Fulbright & Jaworski International LLP,said the credit crunch may mean that accounting firms agree exclusions orlimitations in engagement letters with clients that would release them fromliability for past audits. ‘This may be an area to watch,’ said Warren-Smith.

The bulk of legal action is likely to begin within the next 12 to 18 months,lawyers said.

Peter Wyman, head of professional affairs at PricewateerhouseCoopers, said theprofession had improved the quality of audits. He said he would be surprised ifany legal action against auditors had any foundation.

Chris Dickson, executive counsel of the accounting regulator JDS, said thecrunch might change how auditors treat credit ratings.

‘One issue must be whether the auditor can rely on the rating of [an asset]from one of the ratings agencies and if not what more assurances it might bereasonable for an auditor to obtain,’ he said.


Firms braced for crunch claims

Nick Huber, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 08:08:00

Litigation experts warn firms that they could be sued over their roles in thepackaging up of US sub-prime mortgage assets

Firms could be vulnerable to law suits over their role in credit crunchrelated securitisations, lawyers have warned, as the profession braces itselffor any exposure it may have to the global financial crisis.

Litigation experts have warned that firms could be sued over their roles inthe packaging up of US sub-prime mortgage assets, which triggered the crisis.

Separately, lawyers have warned companies to be wary of firms trying to useliability limitation procedures to try and limit claims for prior year audits.

Nik Yeo, a specialist in finance litigation at barristers’Fountain CourtChambers, Temple, said accountants who had assisted banks in the design oraudit of structured financial

products may be vulnerable to legal action. ‘A firm who has put their name toeven part of an offering document could be in the firing line depending on whatthey attested to,’ he said.

Lawyers suggested that there is no sign of major litigation coming through,but many believe it is just a question of when rather than if.

Chris Warren-Smith, partner at Fulbright & Jaworski International LLP,said the credit crunch may mean that accounting firms agree exclusions orlimitations in engagement letters with clients that would release them fromliability for past audits. ‘This may be an area to watch,’ said Warren-Smith.

The bulk of legal action is likely to begin within the next 12 to 18 months,lawyers said.

Peter Wyman, head of professional affairs at PricewateerhouseCoopers, said theprofession had improved the quality of audits. He said he would be surprised ifany legal action against auditors had any foundation.

Chris Dickson, executive counsel of the accounting regulator JDS, said thecrunch might change how auditors treat credit ratings.

‘One issue must be whether the auditor can rely on the rating of [an asset]from one of the ratings agencies and if not what more assurances it might bereasonable for an auditor to obtain,’ he said.


M&A market collapse - down $US90bn

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 06:49:00

The M&A market plummets while deals worth almost $90bn collapse sinceSeptember 1

Mergers and acquisitions worth close to $US90bn (£51.8bn) have collapsedsince

September 1 as the global financial crisis hampers companies from completingdeals.

Credit agency Experian became the latestBritish group to abandon plans for a deal

yesterday, saying it had decided against selling its online price comparison

website Price-Grabber, The Times reports.

Figures from Dealogic show M&Adeals totalling $US121.6bn have been withdrawn

globally since September 1 and deals worth about $US89.5bn have collapsedwithout new bidders, most of which occurred after September 15, when LehmanBrothers filed for bankruptcy.

Mark Jarvis, an Ernst & Young partner specialising in transactionadvisory

services, said that, although share prices had plummeted, opening up big

opportunities for strong companies to pick up bargains, the great volatility inprices

made it practically impossible for prospective buyers to put a value to theirtargets.

Further reading:

ReadThe Times story


M&A market collapse - down $US90bn

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Thursday 16 October 2008 at 06:49:00

The M&A market plummets while deals worth almost $90bn collapse sinceSeptember 1

Mergers and acquisitions worth close to $US90bn (£51.8bn) have collapsedsince

September 1 as the global financial crisis hampers companies from completingdeals.

Credit agency Experian became the latestBritish group to abandon plans for a deal

yesterday, saying it had decided against selling its online price comparison

website Price-Grabber, The Times reports.

Figures from Dealogic show M&Adeals totalling $US121.6bn have been withdrawn

globally since September 1 and deals worth about $US89.5bn have collapsedwithout new bidders, most of which occurred after September 15, when LehmanBrothers filed for bankruptcy.

Mark Jarvis, an Ernst & Young partner specialising in transactionadvisory

services, said that, although share prices had plummeted, opening up big

opportunities for strong companies to pick up bargains, the great volatility inprices

made it practically impossible for prospective buyers to put a value to theirtargets.

Further reading:

ReadThe Times story


No legal action against PwC for Rock audit

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 15 October 2008 at 09:56:00

PricewaterhouseCoopers will not be dragged through the courts by managementof Northern Rock after forensic probe

PricewaterhouseCoopers will not face legal action for its audit of NorthernRock, the troubled bank's top brass has announced.

Earlier this year, Northern Rock commissioned a probe into PwC's audit of thebank and on the findings of KPMG Forensic decided not to drag the auditorsthrough the courts on a negligence claim. There were insufficent grounds to takethe former directors of the bank to court, Northern Rock added.

Northern Rock said in astatementto the City: 'A review of the conduct of the previous board in respect offunding and liquidity has been undertaken with the assistance of externaladvisors, Freshfields and KPMG Forensic.

The board has concluded that there are insufficient grounds to proceed withany legal action for negligence against the former directors, and has nointention of bringing any such action. The board has also completed a similarreview in respect of the company's auditors and has determined that no action iswarranted.'


No legal action against PwC for Rock audit

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 15 October 2008 at 09:56:00

PricewaterhouseCoopers will not be dragged through the courts by managementof Northern Rock after forensic probe

PricewaterhouseCoopers will not face legal action for its audit of NorthernRock, the troubled bank's top brass has announced.

Earlier this year, Northern Rock commissioned a probe into PwC's audit of thebank and on the findings of KPMG Forensic decided not to drag the auditorsthrough the courts on a negligence claim. There were insufficent grounds to takethe former directors of the bank to court, Northern Rock added.

Northern Rock said in astatementto the City: 'A review of the conduct of the previous board in respect offunding and liquidity has been undertaken with the assistance of externaladvisors, Freshfields and KPMG Forensic.

The board has concluded that there are insufficient grounds to proceed withany legal action for negligence against the former directors, and has nointention of bringing any such action. The board has also completed a similarreview in respect of the company's auditors and has determined that no action iswarranted.'


Vantis chief calls for change to insolvency laws

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 15 October 2008 at 04:39:00

Vantis chief is calling for a change to UK's insolvency laws ahead of rise inbusiness failures

Nick O'Reilly, director ofVantis and head of businessrecovery association R3, says existing laws prevent turnaround firms fromrescuing companies struggling under the effects of the economic downturn.

He is calling for changes to UK insolvency laws to be able to handle theexpected rise in business failures, which, according to research byPricewaterhouseCoopers, reached a five-year high already in the second quarter.More than 3,200 businesses in England and Wales became insolvent - up 22% onthe second three months of 2007, according to mandadeals.co.uk.

'Normally something can be salvaged by selling the business, but our worry isthat there could be such a high number of cases that there might not be enoughbuyers, which could lead to more shutdowns,' he said.

O'Reilly said the government needed to give turnaround firms more time tohelp bring companies out of administration and allow business owners to borrowagainst business assets even if they were already leavered.

Further reading:

Readthe mandadeals.co.uk story


Vantis chief calls for change to insolvency laws

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 15 October 2008 at 04:39:00

Vantis chief is calling for a change to UK's insolvency laws ahead of rise inbusiness failures

Nick O'Reilly, director ofVantis and head of businessrecovery association R3, says existing laws prevent turnaround firms fromrescuing companies struggling under the effects of the economic downturn.

He is calling for changes to UK insolvency laws to be able to handle theexpected rise in business failures, which, according to research byPricewaterhouseCoopers, reached a five-year high already in the second quarter.More than 3,200 businesses in England and Wales became insolvent - up 22% onthe second three months of 2007, according to mandadeals.co.uk.

'Normally something can be salvaged by selling the business, but our worry isthat there could be such a high number of cases that there might not be enoughbuyers, which could lead to more shutdowns,' he said.

O'Reilly said the government needed to give turnaround firms more time tohelp bring companies out of administration and allow business owners to borrowagainst business assets even if they were already leavered.

Further reading:

Readthe mandadeals.co.uk story


Europe battles over fair value carve out

Gavin Hinks, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 14 October 2008 at 18:16:00

Commission officials debate new carve out to IFRS allowing reclassificationof controversial financial instruments

Efforts are underway in Brussels to create a carve out to internationalaccounting standards that would allow sweeping changes to the classification offinancial assets that would allow institutions to sidestep a fair valuecalculation for all financial instruments including controversial derivatives.

Experts immediately said it could have huge ramifications for thecomparability of accounts from company to company, and country to country, andcould severely damage efforts at converging international with US standards.

A Council of Ministers meeting is due to decide today whether to carve outthe key paragraphs, nine and 50, of IAS39.

Supporters of the carve out believe it could provide significant help tobanks struggling in the credit crisis and help strengthen balance sheets.

Observers said there was furious lobbying under way of finance ministryrepresentatives sitting on the Accounting Regulatory Committee that advises EUleaders. However, experienced commission watchers cast doubt on whether thecommittee could influence politicians at this stage.

Defenders of fair value criticsed the carve out saying it would allow allfinancial instruments to be transferred from ‘held for sale’ to ‘held forinvestment’, including all derivatives, thus avoiding a fair value calculation.

They said the proposals would also remove the need to recognise losses onassets on a timely basis, the need to report a transfer from sale to investmentand would allow the reversal of statements reporting losses.

Controversial credit default swaps would be among the derivatives that couldbe reclassified under a carve out, though not under IASB plans announced onMonday.

Those would allow securities, in rare circumstances, such as the currentcrisis, to be reclassified in the same way US companies are permitted to.

In allowing reclassification the IASB believed it was satisfying demands fromEU leaders to create a level playing field between IFRS users and US companies.But the arguments for a further carve out have continued.

Critics say the carve out proposals would create a global accountingimbalance and lead investors to lose confidence in financial reports using therelevant standards.

Insiders believe the outcome is too close to call though others believe thebalance will be tipped in favour of rejecting the carve out.

It is understood that the carve out is being driven by French officials butthere is opposition to the move from other European states.

Gordon Brown has made statements in the press viewed as supporting fair valuebut it remains unclear how far his opposition to a carve out will be pushed.

One insider close to debate said: ‘This is politics, not accounting.’

A fresh statement this week from the IASB re-emphasised that in a crisis fairvalue measurement does not mean valuing assets as if for a distressed sale or ina bankruptcy. It also accepted that companies could use their own assumptionsabout future cash flows in calculating fair value for securities in an illiquidmarket.

The board has now made significant movements to address concerns withoutactually suspending fair value in the way many politicians and senior executiveshave demanded over recent weeks.


Europe battles over fair value carve out

Gavin Hinks, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 14 October 2008 at 18:16:00

Commission officials debate new carve out to IFRS allowing reclassificationof controversial financial instruments

Efforts are underway in Brussels to create a carve out to internationalaccounting standards that would allow sweeping changes to the classification offinancial assets that would allow institutions to sidestep a fair valuecalculation for all financial instruments including controversial derivatives.

Experts immediately said it could have huge ramifications for thecomparability of accounts from company to company, and country to country, andcould severely damage efforts at converging international with US standards.

A Council of Ministers meeting is due to decide today whether to carve outthe key paragraphs, nine and 50, of IAS39.

Supporters of the carve out believe it could provide significant help tobanks struggling in the credit crisis and help strengthen balance sheets.

Observers said there was furious lobbying under way of finance ministryrepresentatives sitting on the Accounting Regulatory Committee that advises EUleaders. However, experienced commission watchers cast doubt on whether thecommittee could influence politicians at this stage.

Defenders of fair value criticsed the carve out saying it would allow allfinancial instruments to be transferred from ‘held for sale’ to ‘held forinvestment’, including all derivatives, thus avoiding a fair value calculation.

They said the proposals would also remove the need to recognise losses onassets on a timely basis, the need to report a transfer from sale to investmentand would allow the reversal of statements reporting losses.

Controversial credit default swaps would be among the derivatives that couldbe reclassified under a carve out, though not under IASB plans announced onMonday.

Those would allow securities, in rare circumstances, such as the currentcrisis, to be reclassified in the same way US companies are permitted to.

In allowing reclassification the IASB believed it was satisfying demands fromEU leaders to create a level playing field between IFRS users and US companies.But the arguments for a further carve out have continued.

Critics say the carve out proposals would create a global accountingimbalance and lead investors to lose confidence in financial reports using therelevant standards.

Insiders believe the outcome is too close to call though others believe thebalance will be tipped in favour of rejecting the carve out.

It is understood that the carve out is being driven by French officials butthere is opposition to the move from other European states.

Gordon Brown has made statements in the press viewed as supporting fair valuebut it remains unclear how far his opposition to a carve out will be pushed.

One insider close to debate said: ‘This is politics, not accounting.’

A fresh statement this week from the IASB re-emphasised that in a crisis fairvalue measurement does not mean valuing assets as if for a distressed sale or ina bankruptcy. It also accepted that companies could use their own assumptionsabout future cash flows in calculating fair value for securities in an illiquidmarket.

The board has now made significant movements to address concerns withoutactually suspending fair value in the way many politicians and senior executiveshave demanded over recent weeks.


Call for tax 'kick-start' for the SME sector

Judith Tydd, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 14 October 2008 at 10:36:00

Small business and academia discussed inadequacies of corporate tax at theCBI tax conference yesterday

Action over corporate tax is urgently needed to kick-start the SME sector dueto the lack of availabile credit, according to those caught up in the financialstorm.

Speaking at the CBI tax conference, Anne Duncan, chief executive of marinedevelopment company YellowFin, said that, while SME's are not seeking a separatesystem of corporate tax, change is needed.

'The one-stop shop strategy doesn't work for innovation. Do SME's requiredifferent treatment? Most definitely,' she said.

Duncan said corporate tax rates are too high and the increasing amount ofchanges to the tax structure is an unnecessary burden to business.

A growing consensus shows the UK government needs to be more transparent inconsulting and implementing changes to the system, and Duncan said HM Revenue& Customs needs to start working in partnership with business and not as anadversary.

'A long term strategy would help. We don't want any surprises,' she said.

Judith Freedman, professor of taxation law at University of Oxford, saidwhile it's not possible to design a system of corporate tax without consideringSME's, a separate rate would create too many barriers.

'SME's have to be part of the initial design. It can't be a case of get thelarge firms sorted then deal with the small firms later,' she said.

Despite concerns expressed by small business, Freedman said areas of PAYE andVAT are higher compliance burdens to an SME. In addition, compliance withemployment law is seen as more cumbersome and costly than tax.

Chaz Roy-Chowdhury, head of taxation at ACCA, also said a lack oftransparency is hindering growth of small business and that a more flexibleapproach is needed.


Call for tax 'kick-start' for the SME sector

Judith Tydd, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 14 October 2008 at 10:36:00

Small business and academia discussed inadequacies of corporate tax at theCBI tax conference yesterday

Action over corporate tax is urgently needed to kick-start the SME sector dueto the lack of availabile credit, according to those caught up in the financialstorm.

Speaking at the CBI tax conference, Anne Duncan, chief executive of marinedevelopment company YellowFin, said that, while SME's are not seeking a separatesystem of corporate tax, change is needed.

'The one-stop shop strategy doesn't work for innovation. Do SME's requiredifferent treatment? Most definitely,' she said.

Duncan said corporate tax rates are too high and the increasing amount ofchanges to the tax structure is an unnecessary burden to business.

A growing consensus shows the UK government needs to be more transparent inconsulting and implementing changes to the system, and Duncan said HM Revenue& Customs needs to start working in partnership with business and not as anadversary.

'A long term strategy would help. We don't want any surprises,' she said.

Judith Freedman, professor of taxation law at University of Oxford, saidwhile it's not possible to design a system of corporate tax without consideringSME's, a separate rate would create too many barriers.

'SME's have to be part of the initial design. It can't be a case of get thelarge firms sorted then deal with the small firms later,' she said.

Despite concerns expressed by small business, Freedman said areas of PAYE andVAT are higher compliance burdens to an SME. In addition, compliance withemployment law is seen as more cumbersome and costly than tax.

Chaz Roy-Chowdhury, head of taxation at ACCA, also said a lack oftransparency is hindering growth of small business and that a more flexibleapproach is needed.


Fair value critics turn on guidance

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 14 October 2008 at 09:54:00

Fair value critics say that rules for illiquid markets create fire saleprices, regardless of the intentions of the guidance

The American Bankers Association has said fair value rules for illiquidmarkets are still not working, despite guidance from standards setters.

The body wants Securities and Exchange Commission should override guidancefrom the Financial Accounting Standards Board on hard-to-value assets,CFO.comreported.

FASB issued guidance on the controversial accounting method, stressing thatfire sale prices do not constitute fair value. But it has also said that therisk of a lack of liquidity should be built into cashflow assessments ofderivatives nevertheless, a move that the ABA says makes its guidance'circular'.

The guidance says: 'Regardless of the valuation technique used, an entitymust include appropriate risk adjustments that market participants would makefor non-performance and liquidity risks.'

Edward L Yingling, president and chief executive officer of the ABA, saidthat the inclusion of liquidity risk in modelling 'brings the guidance fullcircle back to distressed sale values.'

The body has been a persistent critic of fair value accounting, saying thatthe fire sale prices used by banks in their books have accentuated the currentbanking crisis.

'Given the importance of this issue, the impact it has on the crisis in thefinancial markets, and the seeming inability of the FASB to address in ameaningful way the problems of using fair-value in dysfunctional markets, webelieve it is necessary for the SEC to use its statutory authority to step inand override the guidance issued by FASB,' Yingling wrote.

Further Reading:

Read the CFO.comarticle


Fair value critics turn on guidance

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 14 October 2008 at 09:54:00

Fair value critics say that rules for illiquid markets create fire saleprices, regardless of the intentions of the guidance

The American Bankers Association has said fair value rules for illiquidmarkets are still not working, despite guidance from standards setters.

The body wants Securities and Exchange Commission should override guidancefrom the Financial Accounting Standards Board on hard-to-value assets,CFO.comreported.

FASB issued guidance on the controversial accounting method, stressing thatfire sale prices do not constitute fair value. But it has also said that therisk of a lack of liquidity should be built into cashflow assessments ofderivatives nevertheless, a move that the ABA says makes its guidance'circular'.

The guidance says: 'Regardless of the valuation technique used, an entitymust include appropriate risk adjustments that market participants would makefor non-performance and liquidity risks.'

Edward L Yingling, president and chief executive officer of the ABA, saidthat the inclusion of liquidity risk in modelling 'brings the guidance fullcircle back to distressed sale values.'

The body has been a persistent critic of fair value accounting, saying thatthe fire sale prices used by banks in their books have accentuated the currentbanking crisis.

'Given the importance of this issue, the impact it has on the crisis in thefinancial markets, and the seeming inability of the FASB to address in ameaningful way the problems of using fair-value in dysfunctional markets, webelieve it is necessary for the SEC to use its statutory authority to step inand override the guidance issued by FASB,' Yingling wrote.

Further Reading:

Read the CFO.comarticle


Rock FD says repayments will be shelved for 6 months

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 21 May 2008 at 10:59:00

Godbehere tells Treasury select committee that Northern Rock's £25bn IOU tothe government will be paid back later than previously thought

Northern Rock's finance chief has said that the nationalised bank's loan repayment to the government will have to be put off until 2011....

Read the full article


QinetiQ appoints new CFO

Alex Hawkes, Accountancy Age, Wednesday 21 May 2008 at 09:51:00

Defence contractor names Logica deputy as its new CFO, replacing Doug Webb

QinetiQ, the defence and security group spun out of the Ministry of Defence, has appointed David Mellors as its CFO....

Read the full article


AOLTime Warner ex-finance chiefs sued for fraud

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 20 May 2008 at 15:32:00

SEC goes after US media giant's former top brass, charging them withoverstating revenues by more than $1bn

Former finance bosses at AOL Time Warner are being sued by the SEC for fraud. The complaint, filed in federal district court in Manhattan, alleges they took part in a...

Read the full article


REIT conversion plans announced by Mitchells & Butlers

Penny Sukhraj, Accountancy Age, Tuesday 20 May 2008 at 09:34:00

The plans will also see two executives from Robert Tchenguiz's investmentvehicle, R20, join the board

Plans to convert to a REIT have been announced by pub group Mitchells & Butlers, who are set to 'actively explore opportunities for managed pub and sector consolidation.' The group...

Read the full article


Accounting errors hit Alumasc's profits

Barbara Buchanan, Accountancy Age, Monday 19 May 2008 at 17:08:00

Board of Alumasc Group promises to strengthen management and processes toprevent another accounting mistake occurring

Building and engineering products firm Alumasc Group said profitability for its division which makes die cast components will be £1m lower due to accounting errors....

Read the full article


Darling to address CBI as tax panel takes shape

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Monday 19 May 2008 at 11:25:00

Chancellor expected to try and appease influential employers' body angered atchanges to the foreign profits taxation framework as seven FDs named onbusiness-government forum list

Alistair Darling is to deliver a speech to the CBI tomorrow in a bid to convince the group that the planned overhaul of the taxation of foreign profits rules will...

Read the full article


ICAEW fellow questioned by US over BAE

Penny Sukhraj, Accountancy Age, Monday 19 May 2008 at 10:09:00

Chief executive of BAE Mike Turner, who is also chairman of BAA and deputychairman of Barclays Bank, was also detained by US officials alongside Sir Nigelin Houston

ICAEW fellow and non-executive director of BAE Systems Sir Nigel Rudd was detained by the US Department of Justice for in relation to investigations into bribery allegations against British arms...

Read the full article


Ethel Austin rescued by ex-MK One chief

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Monday 19 May 2008 at 10:07:00

Elaine McPherson snaps up troubled fashion retailer which went intoadministration last month, taking the company off the hands of Menzies CorporateRestructuring

Ethel Austin, the fashion retailer which entered administration last month has been rescued by the former chief exec of the MK One chain....

Read the full article


ITE finance director promoted to CEO

Kevin Reed, Accountancy Age, Monday 19 May 2008 at 09:57:00

FD steps up to take permanent role as chief executive at exhibitions group

Exhibitions group ITE has appointed Russell Taylor as its new group chief executive. Taylor has served as FD at the firm since 2003, and took on the acting CEO role...

Read the full article


ICAEW finds sharp fall in business confidence

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Monday 19 May 2008 at 08:43:00

ICAEW business confidence monitor shows sharp falls in the first quarteracross all sectors of British industry

Business confidence plummeted across all sectors of British industry in the first quarter, although recession is still unlikely, according to the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW)’s...

Read the full article


Former Alta Gas directors gets jail sentence

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Monday 19 May 2008 at 08:23:00

Former Alta Gas directors receive a four and two-year jail sentence aftercompany’s £45m collapse

Former directors of Merseyside bottled gas business Alta Gas, Peter Bradley and Peter Stott, were sentenced last Friday at Liverpool Crown Court to four and two years’ imprisonment, respectively, for...

Read the full article


Vanco sale imminent, slashed from £400m to £1

AccountancyAge.com, Accountancy Age, Monday 19 May 2008 at 07:55:00

The sale of telecom carrier Vanco is imminent, as price is likely to beslashed from £400m to £1

The sale of the troubled telecoms carrier Vanco is expected within the coming two weeks, at a price likely to be slashed from a peak value of £400m to as...

Read the full article


Exclusive: Wenham Major sold to Bentley Jennison

Gavin Hinks, Accountancy Age, Saturday 17 May 2008 at 13:35:00

Sale goes ahead after 'financial irregularities' cripple Wenham Major

The core practice of Wenham Major, the crisis wracked Top 50 firm that entered administration on Wednesday, has been sold to RSM Bentley Jennison for an undisclosed sum....

Read the full article


BA slams 'per plane' tax in prelims

David Jetuah, Accountancy Age, Friday 16 May 2008 at 15:37:00

BA warns of turbulence ahead as change from air passenger duty to per planetax draws closer

BA has warned its shareholders that an overhaul of airplane tax system may rock its fortunes in the future. In releasing its final results today the aviation giant issued a...

Read the full article


Renewable energy could be the way forward for investors

Rachael Singh, Accountancy Age, Friday 16 May 2008 at 14:46:00

A recent survey by Ernst & Young has found that confidence in renewableenergy companies is high despite the current credit crisis.

Investors expect more floats of renewable energy companies this year, Ernst & Young has said. 40% of investors expect new money to be raised through initial public offerings (IPOs) by...

Read the full article


Member Login

Email:
Password:


Forgotten password


Created by iQ media